The more I delve into a way to manipulate reality, the more 'stuff' I uncover, interesting to say the least. This 'stuff' has to do with brainwaves. Just the gist will be explained, although I haven't tested it yet. It is the blueprint for what should occur.
I was trying to find a way to manipulate reality via the technology I already have, basic technology including a brain wave headset. But I wanted to start by being able to tell the future. In order to solve the problem, I use one of my favorite techniques, start from the solution and work backwards.
PROBLEM: Need a way to tell the future.
COMPONENTS: Must use current technology, i.e. brain-wave headset.
What can we get from a brainwave headset...? Raw EEG data. That data can be converted to help whatever needs to be interpreted, in this case reality, or something about it, the future. What are the constraints to manipulate reality...? The device that does so must attach an emotion (not sure) to a 'thought' that dissipates into the fabric of 'what is' and manifests on the other side, i.e. the future. So, I think, somehow the emotions can tell us something, all we have to do is translate EEG data to emotion, and then work from there. One interesting fact is that brain-waves decay over a period of time, meaning a certain pattern of brainwave might contain data from the perceived past, as if it were a print. So I am thinking, how do we connect the past-print to the future...? One theory is that the past has the same knowledge as the future, the "Sigil" is the same, what differs is the interpretation of that pattern.
Going from here, we find out what this constant pattern is and then somehow figure the changing variable, the future, based on a calculation. That means, this constant pattern is the same in the past and the future, so if we isolate it in analysis, we can see what is different and make decisions based off of that. Now, how will this pattern be recognized...? It could be 1s and 0s but since I am more familiar with images, it would be a graphic of some sort. The graphic is made from the raw EEG data sent through an algorithm. We do a simple study and compare the graphics of the past to bring out the surface the "constant sigil". Then we do other analyses to the graphics. I just looked online today and it says, I don't know how true this is, but it says that photographs or digital images can somehow predict the future.
It was here http://english.pravda.ru/society/anomal/26-09-2011/119157-photographs_future-0/.
Perhaps, if we do an analysis on the brain-wave graphic to such an extent, we could get similar results.
That is all I have for now, will update soon.
-XJ
All the theory, all the knowledge, all the heartbreak and drama... starts here. In 2012, XJ Randall started a blog to enhance his association with nature and with God. What he didn't know is that his venture into the unknown was expected for a very, very long time.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Stuff: The Real NEO-Network
Just a note: if you see this idea somewhere else, it probably came from XJ Hall.
This is not really an idea, it is just a different take on what I already have. Briefly, I am building this NEO-Network to function online, but I am having a hard time seeing the difference it would make if it uses an outdated system, if it relies on advertising, or selling personal data to companies, to pay for the bandwidth. Then I thought, hey! We don't have to use ads...!
(a vision)
Jack: John, you're stupid, everyone has to use ads to pay for stuff they put online...
John: Then I won't use online...
Jack: You won't use the internet? Well, that defeats the purpose of the network...
John: Not unless the network runs independent of the WWW.
Jack: What are you saying...?
John: I'm saying, the dirty work must be done, in order to break the nonsensical, because chaos is all too easy to ignore...!
Jack: I see.
John: Basically, we can't keep doing what we're doing. We have to do it different. The Network cannot be run on an old platform. It has to be separate.
(end vision)
So basically, sorry if I'm being blatantly easy with my vocabulary, we create a 'device' that is a receiver and a sender of 'a certain type of ethos or radio wave that may or may not be in public use'. This 'device' will run on practically 'free energy' 'generated via the atmosphere'. The 'device' will be larger at first, but as technology progresses, it gets smaller, and could possibly become as small as a usb. The device will be able to be 'plugged into' via 'electrical or other means' and will have a 'display' such like a laptop, computer, or pad screen. There will be no connecting to satellite, and probably no connecting to any wires, or any wires that are tapped into by the WWW. This will be an independent network. How will information flow...? It will be an authentic experience, one that emulates or copies what had occurred 100 to 200 to 1000's of years before this. Information was passed via word of mouth or pamphlet. The information could only be accessed from exposure from one node to the next, like ants in an ant hill. It would be different, because the network would depend on the nodes in the area (because it doesn't rely on satellite), therefore making it a ground-network. NO. A user would not have the luxury of connecting to the WWW. But that is what makes it different. We start manufacturing these, get more people interested, the network will grow in each area. So there will be unique information to each 'area-network' but the setup of each node's GUI would be the same. Now some might say, "How do you find out information from across the world...?". Good question. To answer it would require using something of the scope of quantum mechanics, a 'different type of technology not currently seen by the public, making its debut for the first time ever'. It would possibly be 'used in an unorthodox way', extorted, used differently than intended, or pumped up on steroids.
Well, that's it. Like I said, if I see someone else with this idea, it probably came from my realization. I am not kidding when I say it could actually happen in the future. Remember from my previous notes, knowledge is independent of distance. That means, no matter what the distance, wherever you go, the knowledge is the same, NO MATTER WHAT. It depends on what our technology is, what we are capable of, that will allow us to do things that we have never done before, that will allow us to tap into this 'force' and discern what is happening anywhere at any time. It could happen. Maybe it already is...
That is all,
-XJ
This is not really an idea, it is just a different take on what I already have. Briefly, I am building this NEO-Network to function online, but I am having a hard time seeing the difference it would make if it uses an outdated system, if it relies on advertising, or selling personal data to companies, to pay for the bandwidth. Then I thought, hey! We don't have to use ads...!
(a vision)
Jack: John, you're stupid, everyone has to use ads to pay for stuff they put online...
John: Then I won't use online...
Jack: You won't use the internet? Well, that defeats the purpose of the network...
John: Not unless the network runs independent of the WWW.
Jack: What are you saying...?
John: I'm saying, the dirty work must be done, in order to break the nonsensical, because chaos is all too easy to ignore...!
Jack: I see.
John: Basically, we can't keep doing what we're doing. We have to do it different. The Network cannot be run on an old platform. It has to be separate.
(end vision)
So basically, sorry if I'm being blatantly easy with my vocabulary, we create a 'device' that is a receiver and a sender of 'a certain type of ethos or radio wave that may or may not be in public use'. This 'device' will run on practically 'free energy' 'generated via the atmosphere'. The 'device' will be larger at first, but as technology progresses, it gets smaller, and could possibly become as small as a usb. The device will be able to be 'plugged into' via 'electrical or other means' and will have a 'display' such like a laptop, computer, or pad screen. There will be no connecting to satellite, and probably no connecting to any wires, or any wires that are tapped into by the WWW. This will be an independent network. How will information flow...? It will be an authentic experience, one that emulates or copies what had occurred 100 to 200 to 1000's of years before this. Information was passed via word of mouth or pamphlet. The information could only be accessed from exposure from one node to the next, like ants in an ant hill. It would be different, because the network would depend on the nodes in the area (because it doesn't rely on satellite), therefore making it a ground-network. NO. A user would not have the luxury of connecting to the WWW. But that is what makes it different. We start manufacturing these, get more people interested, the network will grow in each area. So there will be unique information to each 'area-network' but the setup of each node's GUI would be the same. Now some might say, "How do you find out information from across the world...?". Good question. To answer it would require using something of the scope of quantum mechanics, a 'different type of technology not currently seen by the public, making its debut for the first time ever'. It would possibly be 'used in an unorthodox way', extorted, used differently than intended, or pumped up on steroids.
Well, that's it. Like I said, if I see someone else with this idea, it probably came from my realization. I am not kidding when I say it could actually happen in the future. Remember from my previous notes, knowledge is independent of distance. That means, no matter what the distance, wherever you go, the knowledge is the same, NO MATTER WHAT. It depends on what our technology is, what we are capable of, that will allow us to do things that we have never done before, that will allow us to tap into this 'force' and discern what is happening anywhere at any time. It could happen. Maybe it already is...
That is all,
-XJ
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Projects: Noter
Here is a mock-up I did of a project I'm about to build. Briefly: the 'run' button double functions to record and playback on the timeline. When it 'runs' it records strokes and audio as well. If the user 'sketches' while running, the sketch can fade into the background. Pause the timeline to post a note. Content can only be changed on the creator's laptop but shared and viewed by other users, notes are stored in local storage, eventually there will be a web-socket network to watch and share automated notes in real time...
-XJ
-XJ
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Projects and Technology: XJ-Chat Demo
I created this little demo program to test out HTML5 / JavaScript sound before I convert it to websockets. Yes, it actually works (in Chrome) without Flash...! The program records the user's voice, and sends it as an audible message in chat. In this demo, when the user hovers over the audio, it takes some time to load. However, in future versions, we will be using websockets to execute some interesting new techniques for storing the audio, so it will be less slow, probably many times faster. You can check out the demo here.
Excited yet...? hmm...
-XJ
Excited yet...? hmm...
-XJ
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Thoughts: Flatland
"Deeds, and not words, shall proclaim the truth. Listen, my friend. I have told you I can see from my position in Space the inside of all things that you consider closed. ..."
-Section 17, Flatland by Author A Square
I tried to make an analogy to this book and while I was reading through I picked up some neat thoughts. I'm looking for the 'out' and I believe the author knew of it. Here are my thoughts, I have not changed them in any way yet...
"This tells me that spirits from the 4th dimension can see our thoughts. But thoughts are universal, meaning it is allowed to be construed by a 4th dimensional being because it is a physical nature, similar to a smell of a flower in the 3rd dimension. The smell can be judged as either good or bad but the smell remains the same no matter who smells it. the letters change based on language, but the meaning is not dependent on language.
i think, in higher dimensions, communication is not dependent on language, where letters change, but 'meaning' which is based on physicality. in higher dimensions, an explicit meaning cannot be altered. so basically, spirits would communicate by meaning, but humans interpret meaning and recognize it as language... this also might *mean that our thoughts are physical or can be seen in higher dimensions... it wouldn't matter whether they have language or not, meaning is universal, it is based on vibration, frequency, energy. this means that two different people from two different backgrounds and languages could telepathically (brainwave headset) telepathically communicate meaning without language and understand what the other person is saying it would be in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration so we would have a headset able to communicate with the brain...
it is possible that all of the dimensions are around us, interacting with them depends on whether we are able to pick them up or not. brain == 3D, thoughts == 4D? not sure yet... well it says that nothing in 4D is able to be picked up in 3D but what if we are part 4D? then we could pick up some elements of 4D nature. how is it possible for a human to experience the 4D world after taking DMT if not one part of him was of 4D nature...? or... perhaps the meaning of what we see is interpreted as a spirit world. leads to everything is a meanning dependent upon translation. is meaning knowledge with an emotion...? just like knowledge, maybe emotion is a dimension as well...?"
-XJ
-Section 17, Flatland by Author A Square
I tried to make an analogy to this book and while I was reading through I picked up some neat thoughts. I'm looking for the 'out' and I believe the author knew of it. Here are my thoughts, I have not changed them in any way yet...
"This tells me that spirits from the 4th dimension can see our thoughts. But thoughts are universal, meaning it is allowed to be construed by a 4th dimensional being because it is a physical nature, similar to a smell of a flower in the 3rd dimension. The smell can be judged as either good or bad but the smell remains the same no matter who smells it. the letters change based on language, but the meaning is not dependent on language.
i think, in higher dimensions, communication is not dependent on language, where letters change, but 'meaning' which is based on physicality. in higher dimensions, an explicit meaning cannot be altered. so basically, spirits would communicate by meaning, but humans interpret meaning and recognize it as language... this also might *mean that our thoughts are physical or can be seen in higher dimensions... it wouldn't matter whether they have language or not, meaning is universal, it is based on vibration, frequency, energy. this means that two different people from two different backgrounds and languages could telepathically (brainwave headset) telepathically communicate meaning without language and understand what the other person is saying it would be in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration so we would have a headset able to communicate with the brain...
it is possible that all of the dimensions are around us, interacting with them depends on whether we are able to pick them up or not. brain == 3D, thoughts == 4D? not sure yet... well it says that nothing in 4D is able to be picked up in 3D but what if we are part 4D? then we could pick up some elements of 4D nature. how is it possible for a human to experience the 4D world after taking DMT if not one part of him was of 4D nature...? or... perhaps the meaning of what we see is interpreted as a spirit world. leads to everything is a meanning dependent upon translation. is meaning knowledge with an emotion...? just like knowledge, maybe emotion is a dimension as well...?"
-XJ
Monday, October 21, 2013
Brief Beef: 3 Ideas
Here is the simple brief beef for three ideas I encountered while walking around downtown. The last one is the best.
1.) Organic Motion Recorder (as opposed to electronic).
3D-Time Picture Wall with Invisible-Film: A chunk of thin, overlapping and translucent film papers the size of a wall and thickness of about three to five inches. The wall captures light projected onto it after the very top layer is peeled off exposing it to light. In order for the wall to 'capture' motion, each layer of the wall must be factorized to 'develop' at a mathematical rate respective to the position of the layer according to a time function. During the process of developing a layer image will slowly turn opaque, whence upon being fully developed, it is completely opaque, blocking light to the layers beneath it. The end results in a wall whose layers can be illuminated in a certain fashion to replay a motion. There are additional things that would have to be done that are not mentioned.
Now, if you think that idea was impractical, you're right. However, it leads to several other ideas. The first is the Holographic parallel of this.
In the Holographic version, we do use electricity to record all of the 3D data of a space in motion with a Holographic camera. The data is output to a Holographic display device that would actually display the depth of the recreated scene instead of a flat picture. The display would be a wall in height and length.
2.) Is it possible to retrieve a recording of the past out of thin air...? Results:
A.) Store the recording / data in air.
B.) Look into the past directly.
B. is a better alternative. We might have help by looking at some of Nikola Tesla's work and notes.
How...? A Time Frame Projector. The projector is a doorway in size and is a clear, artificially intelligent, glass. It is touch screen glass with Holographic display. Basically, it would have controls that allow the user to affect what happens in 'time', the past, looking through the glass to the projected other side. Get it...? The projector somehow changes the 'frequency' or vibration of the 'image' of the present but not the present itself. How do we get the 'image' of the present? On to the next idea:
3.) Synthetic Brainwave / Thought Generator.
So how do we get the past 'image' for the last idea...? If time is reliant on a perception, then, I think, our brain waves would be the control unit for that perception. That means by manipulating a person's brainwaves in a certain manner (energy, frequency, vibration), we could get them to visualize the past. But we want to project this past onto a screen, so instead of using a real person and projecting the resultant effects, we create a synthetic brain wave generator, so we can manipulate it to project the past back to us, and then onto the Holographic display. It would essentially be a kind of synthetic 'brain' specifically for traveling time.
Other things a synthetic brainwave generator would be useful for is creating 'thoughts', which have the power to manipulate reality when coupled with an emotion.
That is all,
-XJ
1.) Organic Motion Recorder (as opposed to electronic).
3D-Time Picture Wall with Invisible-Film: A chunk of thin, overlapping and translucent film papers the size of a wall and thickness of about three to five inches. The wall captures light projected onto it after the very top layer is peeled off exposing it to light. In order for the wall to 'capture' motion, each layer of the wall must be factorized to 'develop' at a mathematical rate respective to the position of the layer according to a time function. During the process of developing a layer image will slowly turn opaque, whence upon being fully developed, it is completely opaque, blocking light to the layers beneath it. The end results in a wall whose layers can be illuminated in a certain fashion to replay a motion. There are additional things that would have to be done that are not mentioned.
Now, if you think that idea was impractical, you're right. However, it leads to several other ideas. The first is the Holographic parallel of this.
In the Holographic version, we do use electricity to record all of the 3D data of a space in motion with a Holographic camera. The data is output to a Holographic display device that would actually display the depth of the recreated scene instead of a flat picture. The display would be a wall in height and length.
2.) Is it possible to retrieve a recording of the past out of thin air...? Results:
A.) Store the recording / data in air.
B.) Look into the past directly.
B. is a better alternative. We might have help by looking at some of Nikola Tesla's work and notes.
How...? A Time Frame Projector. The projector is a doorway in size and is a clear, artificially intelligent, glass. It is touch screen glass with Holographic display. Basically, it would have controls that allow the user to affect what happens in 'time', the past, looking through the glass to the projected other side. Get it...? The projector somehow changes the 'frequency' or vibration of the 'image' of the present but not the present itself. How do we get the 'image' of the present? On to the next idea:
3.) Synthetic Brainwave / Thought Generator.
So how do we get the past 'image' for the last idea...? If time is reliant on a perception, then, I think, our brain waves would be the control unit for that perception. That means by manipulating a person's brainwaves in a certain manner (energy, frequency, vibration), we could get them to visualize the past. But we want to project this past onto a screen, so instead of using a real person and projecting the resultant effects, we create a synthetic brain wave generator, so we can manipulate it to project the past back to us, and then onto the Holographic display. It would essentially be a kind of synthetic 'brain' specifically for traveling time.
Other things a synthetic brainwave generator would be useful for is creating 'thoughts', which have the power to manipulate reality when coupled with an emotion.
That is all,
-XJ
Saturday, October 19, 2013
Technology Report: Manipulation of Reality via Thought Broadcasting
XJ Hall
10.20.2013
"The future is not technology, it's how we use it."
Parts of this post are detailed loosely in several previous entries, Image Broadcasting / Projection Theory and Theory: Request / Response Theory.
In another previous post, I said that reality is the interpretation of knowledge, inherent in the Master Idea, a projection by one's "device", that being the consciousness and its physical manifestation, the brain. At this moment, that theory could be no farther from the truth and interestingly paraligns with the process that happens when we emit or broadcast a thought. The undergoing of such activity requires there to be an emotion attached to the process (current theory) reinforcing that only first order organisms, those that are capable of emotion, are capable of manipulating reality (as opposed to second order organisms which are incapable of emotion).
A human as a whole, including one's body and one's brain, whatever makes one's total electrical field or aura, is a 'device' or factory capable of outputting information, data, but more specifically packets of vibrational energy on an indefinite basis. It can be deemed that this is exactly what emotions are, a spectrum of vibrational energy: the higher or lower the vibration the more or less the chance for survival, pointing to the side conclusion that the relationship with 'good' and 'evil' could also be aligned with this assumption.
What I am saying is, this is a process and there is one limitation to it. Currently, it is the lack of evidence or research and information about it. So how would we test it...? How does it work...? A rough sketch is as follows: A thought is generated from the source and projects outward like a wave, affecting anything in its path. The theory states that distance is inconsequential; an atom affected two meters away is the same as an atom affected two billion meters away. All is one. Taking this into account, along with the assumption that time is non-existent, it would seem that there is an opening for a new technology, or at least an interest in, to spring up based on a limitless potential.
For example: in this theory, a thought, or a vibrational packet that is constructed from one's reality 'device', coupled with an 'emotion' (what comprises it) could not only affect people in the room around oneself but could potentially affect someone 1029 miles away (and also in different time frames...!). We could study this with an experiment(s) with a setup in a controlled environment, such as a hanger, that is mostly void of electromagnetic radiation (done with anti-radio wave paint and anti-microwave paint).
Since the walls are lined with reflective material, no thoughts, being electromagnetic in nature, will be able to escape. (This means that the thoughts are not only are kept within a space, but since there is no time, the thoughts from one day might transcend to another... or another year for that matter.) In the open space there can be about 100 people, or more or less, all emitting thoughts according to a guideline (or not). Each participant is set up with thought monitoring device, such as EEG headset or other equivalent. The energy will be measured for all the participants during a trial run. The thoughts cannot go anywhere, so they must be picked up or reflected back into the space. We want to see how the thoughts manifest in each and all participants vibrational energy. The ultimate goal is to devise a systematic approach so it can be 'tinkered' with.
After realizing the mechanics to the system, there are probably several things it could be used for, but it would most notably be used for manipulating reality. Give me time to think of the applications, it's kind of interesting.
-XJ
10.20.2013
"The future is not technology, it's how we use it."
Parts of this post are detailed loosely in several previous entries, Image Broadcasting / Projection Theory and Theory: Request / Response Theory.
In another previous post, I said that reality is the interpretation of knowledge, inherent in the Master Idea, a projection by one's "device", that being the consciousness and its physical manifestation, the brain. At this moment, that theory could be no farther from the truth and interestingly paraligns with the process that happens when we emit or broadcast a thought. The undergoing of such activity requires there to be an emotion attached to the process (current theory) reinforcing that only first order organisms, those that are capable of emotion, are capable of manipulating reality (as opposed to second order organisms which are incapable of emotion).
A human as a whole, including one's body and one's brain, whatever makes one's total electrical field or aura, is a 'device' or factory capable of outputting information, data, but more specifically packets of vibrational energy on an indefinite basis. It can be deemed that this is exactly what emotions are, a spectrum of vibrational energy: the higher or lower the vibration the more or less the chance for survival, pointing to the side conclusion that the relationship with 'good' and 'evil' could also be aligned with this assumption.
What I am saying is, this is a process and there is one limitation to it. Currently, it is the lack of evidence or research and information about it. So how would we test it...? How does it work...? A rough sketch is as follows: A thought is generated from the source and projects outward like a wave, affecting anything in its path. The theory states that distance is inconsequential; an atom affected two meters away is the same as an atom affected two billion meters away. All is one. Taking this into account, along with the assumption that time is non-existent, it would seem that there is an opening for a new technology, or at least an interest in, to spring up based on a limitless potential.
For example: in this theory, a thought, or a vibrational packet that is constructed from one's reality 'device', coupled with an 'emotion' (what comprises it) could not only affect people in the room around oneself but could potentially affect someone 1029 miles away (and also in different time frames...!). We could study this with an experiment(s) with a setup in a controlled environment, such as a hanger, that is mostly void of electromagnetic radiation (done with anti-radio wave paint and anti-microwave paint).
Since the walls are lined with reflective material, no thoughts, being electromagnetic in nature, will be able to escape. (This means that the thoughts are not only are kept within a space, but since there is no time, the thoughts from one day might transcend to another... or another year for that matter.) In the open space there can be about 100 people, or more or less, all emitting thoughts according to a guideline (or not). Each participant is set up with thought monitoring device, such as EEG headset or other equivalent. The energy will be measured for all the participants during a trial run. The thoughts cannot go anywhere, so they must be picked up or reflected back into the space. We want to see how the thoughts manifest in each and all participants vibrational energy. The ultimate goal is to devise a systematic approach so it can be 'tinkered' with.
After realizing the mechanics to the system, there are probably several things it could be used for, but it would most notably be used for manipulating reality. Give me time to think of the applications, it's kind of interesting.
-XJ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

