12.19.2016.
11:15 ET
Goals for today:
Program majority of a program.
Duration: 11 hours.
11 am to 10 pm.
-XJ.
Monday, December 19, 2016
Saturday, February 13, 2016
Thoughts: Comparing the Nobody to Superman
Superman is unstoppable legend. And just like Superman, the Nobody is embodied in the soul of a good society, ONE that will live on forever. Just like Superman, the Nobody can never die, because there always has been, is, and will be a Nobody in every society on any stretch of time frame, to be the ONE paragon of a consummate Truth inherent within us all. We hold this Truth to be self evident, within any and all outlets for query, and observe a law of polar opposites; that a dark cannot exist without a light, and a light cannot exist without a dark. And while the presence of a good perpetually allows there to be evil to antagonize, there will always be good to challenge, counter, and conquer the presence of an evil that opposes it.
-XJ
-XJ
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
KICKSTARTER PROJECT: XJ CORPS TELEPATHY X
10jackofhearts
© 2015 XJ Corps, John Edward Hall (XJ Randall)
Tuesday 30 June 2015
15:08 EST
KICKSTARTER PROJECT: XJ CORPS TELEPATHY X
XJ Corps has launched a new project...! Suffice to say, it needs funding. Tell as many generous people as you can. If funding is successful, the first 33 donors who fund at least $33.00 receive a signed note / artwork at the project's finish (2016-2017). Details at the link below.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1386230683/xj-corps-telepathy-x
Funding window stops on 29 August 2015. I would appreciate it if you guys could help me out.
You help me, I'll help you...
Sincerely,
XJ Randall
John Edward Hall
XJ Corps
313 Perrin Avenue #3
Lafayette, IN 47904
USA
Contact XJ at his email: xjcorps@gmx.com
-XJ
© 2015 XJ Corps, John Edward Hall (XJ Randall)
Tuesday 30 June 2015
15:08 EST
KICKSTARTER PROJECT: XJ CORPS TELEPATHY X
XJ Corps has launched a new project...! Suffice to say, it needs funding. Tell as many generous people as you can. If funding is successful, the first 33 donors who fund at least $33.00 receive a signed note / artwork at the project's finish (2016-2017). Details at the link below.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1386230683/xj-corps-telepathy-x
Funding window stops on 29 August 2015. I would appreciate it if you guys could help me out.
You help me, I'll help you...
Sincerely,
XJ Randall
John Edward Hall
XJ Corps
313 Perrin Avenue #3
Lafayette, IN 47904
USA
Contact XJ at his email: xjcorps@gmx.com
-XJ
Thursday, June 11, 2015
XJ Corps: The 'Sole' Computer / Apparatus
XJ Corps: The 'Sole' Computer / Apparatus
© 2015 XJ Corps, John Edward Hall (XJ Randall)
Thursday 11 June 2015
17:41 EST
Before reading ahead, it is important to be familiar with XJ Corps / User Contract. Some of these Ideas are or will be for sale under XJ Corps. For serious inquiries, contact XJ at his email: xjcorps@gmail.com.
■ ■ ■
© 2015 XJ Corps, John Edward Hall (XJ Randall)
Thursday 11 June 2015
17:41 EST
Before reading ahead, it is important to be familiar with XJ Corps / User Contract. Some of these Ideas are or will be for sale under XJ Corps. For serious inquiries, contact XJ at his email: xjcorps@gmail.com.
■ ■ ■
Here is a basic description of XJ Corps technology known as, "The Sole Computer / Apparatus".
"The Sole (homonym, 'soul') Apparatus is a 'super computer' / consciousness (or artificial A.I.) that exists around a person's body, atmosphere, or within the person's aura, essentially in another dimension. It's purpose is to record all 'imprints' on a consciousness, or 'idea', basically by being linked to it or with it. This includes every direct or indirect contact that is made to, by, from, or through the person. The Sole Apparatus travels with the person where ever one goes. It is weightless in the primary dimension that the user inhabits or operates through. By recording such events, the Sole Apparatus can give records when needed, at times of emergency or speculation and for 'past times sake' (nostalgia). ... (tbc.)"
I won't explain how to build this, but I believe it can be done. Anything is possible.
XJ Randall
John Edward Hall
XJ Corps
-XJ
XJ Corps: Notes June 2015
XJ Corps: Notes June 2015
© 2015 XJ Corps, John Edward Hall (XJ Randall)
Thursday 11 June 2015
16:42 EST
Before reading ahead, it is important to be familiar with XJ Corps / User Contract. Some of these Ideas are or will be for sale under XJ Corps. For serious inquiries, contact XJ at his email: xjcorps@gmail.com.
■ ■ ■
It's been a while since my last blog post. Suffice to say, there are many ideas I would like to share, although most of them cannot be explained in their entirety in this post. Below are the most recent ideas that need to be expanded.
■ President X's First 129 Days
In a future time line of the history of the world, more specifically the United States, President X is ushered into office to make good on promises of a 'New America'. Here are his first 129 days in office.
■ Image Broadcasting: Vicarious Relay of Information
In a more recent 'X-Men' movie, a character known as Professor X is able to talk to people through the 'indirect control' of another person's 'device' or 'shell'. However, the technology that I explain here is based on actual observation and experience, something that has happened to me numerous times.
■ Image Broadcasting: The "GOD VOICE"
■ XJ Corps: The 'Sole' Computer / Apparatus
■ XJ Corps: A Super Computer that is Stored in the Atmosphere
■ XJ Corps: Telepathy X Update
■ Light, Time, and Ideas Experiment and Observation: My Explanation
■ XJ Corps: Additional Notes
■ ■ ■
Explaining these ideas will take some time. Essentially, 'they hit me with a frequency to try and stop me from telling you my technology'; I could do it all in 24 hours, however I don't have the protection I need to do it that quickly.
If you would like to invest in any of these ideas, or wish for me to explain them to you, please feel free to contact me at my email.
You can also follow XJ Corps:
http://twitter.com/xjcorps
http://facebook.com/xjproducts
Sincerely,
XJ Randall
John Edward Hall
XJ Corps
-XJ
© 2015 XJ Corps, John Edward Hall (XJ Randall)
Thursday 11 June 2015
16:42 EST
Before reading ahead, it is important to be familiar with XJ Corps / User Contract. Some of these Ideas are or will be for sale under XJ Corps. For serious inquiries, contact XJ at his email: xjcorps@gmail.com.
■ ■ ■
It's been a while since my last blog post. Suffice to say, there are many ideas I would like to share, although most of them cannot be explained in their entirety in this post. Below are the most recent ideas that need to be expanded.
■ President X's First 129 Days
In a future time line of the history of the world, more specifically the United States, President X is ushered into office to make good on promises of a 'New America'. Here are his first 129 days in office.
■ Image Broadcasting: Vicarious Relay of Information
In a more recent 'X-Men' movie, a character known as Professor X is able to talk to people through the 'indirect control' of another person's 'device' or 'shell'. However, the technology that I explain here is based on actual observation and experience, something that has happened to me numerous times.
■ Image Broadcasting: The "GOD VOICE"
■ XJ Corps: The 'Sole' Computer / Apparatus
■ XJ Corps: A Super Computer that is Stored in the Atmosphere
■ XJ Corps: Telepathy X Update
■ Light, Time, and Ideas Experiment and Observation: My Explanation
■ XJ Corps: Additional Notes
■ ■ ■
Explaining these ideas will take some time. Essentially, 'they hit me with a frequency to try and stop me from telling you my technology'; I could do it all in 24 hours, however I don't have the protection I need to do it that quickly.
If you would like to invest in any of these ideas, or wish for me to explain them to you, please feel free to contact me at my email.
You can also follow XJ Corps:
http://twitter.com/xjcorps
http://facebook.com/xjproducts
Sincerely,
XJ Randall
John Edward Hall
XJ Corps
-XJ
Friday, January 30, 2015
Notes: XJ Sigil
XJ Randall
John Edward Hall
(C) 2014 | 2015
XJ Corps
01.30.2015
14:09 EST
Here is my personal sigil.
-XJ
John Edward Hall
(C) 2014 | 2015
XJ Corps
01.30.2015
14:09 EST
Here is my personal sigil.
-XJ
Saturday, January 10, 2015
Thoughts: The Intelligent Autonomous Recording
Thoughts: The Intelligent Autonomous Recording
XJ Corps
01.10.2015
15:35 EST
Can the past be intelligent and free-thinking...?
The following is a brief two-part theory that explains what I have concluded based from my own experiences within the past year. These notes are subject to change.
First, a brief history. For ten years I had been on an 'anti-psychotic' medication (what is 'psychotic' in the first place, who defines it...?) that seemed to suppress my inner 'psychic' / metaphysical abilities. I determined this once I had purged it from my system in a period after refusing to ingest it. Because of the revival of some of my innate talents, this time frame of about six months was probably one of the most interesting in my early adult life. There were at least several occasions when I would 'communicate' with / through media, otherwise normally non-communicable, specifically via audio speakers.
For the first part, there's a possibility that some 'voices' are 'intelligent' (define voice). They could be a 'copy' of a consciousness (or a part of it) that stems off of the original consciousness that takes precedence. For example, this means that when you record your voice on radio, there is the possibility that the voice that is recorded is independent of your main cognitive processes and awareness, i.e. it acts just as independent as its main counter-part and makes decisions just like its counterpart. A question from this is whether the 'intelligent' voice self-aware. Another question that stems from this is whether the voice acts mostly similar to its main counterpart or if it can have a different 'personality' as well.
From what I can tell, the 'intelligent' voice is an autonomous, involuntary, property. or sub-counterpart, of a main awareness that has, or is, consciousness, transferred to an external medium or 'animable' physicality (define for later).
I could be incorrect, but this is based from my experiences: I am only making an educated guess, however interesting, to the observations I've had. Hell, it might even make a good movie.
The cool thing about it is that the recorded self acts just as independent as its originator.
The 'intelligent' recording is like taking a piece of a person that has the same amount of intelligence and free-will as the person and leaving it for other people to witness even while the person is not in its presence or even aware that it was recorded. This would hold true for when a person creates art, records voice, records motion pictures, etc. (other recording platforms).
To put it short, the second part is that a person's recorded self could act as a medium, or 'canvas', for other intelligent entities to use as an outlet for their own broadcastings / art. This means that person X could hypothetically use person Y's voice recording to broadcast his thoughts, through person Y's voice on the recording. The former theory explains an autonomous, free-thinking 'member'. The latter explains a 'medium' that is controlled by a handler, so to speak.
Other questions that arise from this is whether or not the recording, when it reacts with free-will, does it have anything to do with time (can you hear an autonomous recording that is acting in the future time frame but was was recorded in the past...?).
More for later,
-XJ
XJ Corps
01.10.2015
15:35 EST
Can the past be intelligent and free-thinking...?
The following is a brief two-part theory that explains what I have concluded based from my own experiences within the past year. These notes are subject to change.
First, a brief history. For ten years I had been on an 'anti-psychotic' medication (what is 'psychotic' in the first place, who defines it...?) that seemed to suppress my inner 'psychic' / metaphysical abilities. I determined this once I had purged it from my system in a period after refusing to ingest it. Because of the revival of some of my innate talents, this time frame of about six months was probably one of the most interesting in my early adult life. There were at least several occasions when I would 'communicate' with / through media, otherwise normally non-communicable, specifically via audio speakers.
For the first part, there's a possibility that some 'voices' are 'intelligent' (define voice). They could be a 'copy' of a consciousness (or a part of it) that stems off of the original consciousness that takes precedence. For example, this means that when you record your voice on radio, there is the possibility that the voice that is recorded is independent of your main cognitive processes and awareness, i.e. it acts just as independent as its main counter-part and makes decisions just like its counterpart. A question from this is whether the 'intelligent' voice self-aware. Another question that stems from this is whether the voice acts mostly similar to its main counterpart or if it can have a different 'personality' as well.
From what I can tell, the 'intelligent' voice is an autonomous, involuntary, property. or sub-counterpart, of a main awareness that has, or is, consciousness, transferred to an external medium or 'animable' physicality (define for later).
I could be incorrect, but this is based from my experiences: I am only making an educated guess, however interesting, to the observations I've had. Hell, it might even make a good movie.
The cool thing about it is that the recorded self acts just as independent as its originator.
The 'intelligent' recording is like taking a piece of a person that has the same amount of intelligence and free-will as the person and leaving it for other people to witness even while the person is not in its presence or even aware that it was recorded. This would hold true for when a person creates art, records voice, records motion pictures, etc. (other recording platforms).
To put it short, the second part is that a person's recorded self could act as a medium, or 'canvas', for other intelligent entities to use as an outlet for their own broadcastings / art. This means that person X could hypothetically use person Y's voice recording to broadcast his thoughts, through person Y's voice on the recording. The former theory explains an autonomous, free-thinking 'member'. The latter explains a 'medium' that is controlled by a handler, so to speak.
Other questions that arise from this is whether or not the recording, when it reacts with free-will, does it have anything to do with time (can you hear an autonomous recording that is acting in the future time frame but was was recorded in the past...?).
More for later,
-XJ
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Notes: Project Telepathy X
© 2014-2015 XJ Corps,
XJ Randall, John Edward Hall
NOTES
12.31.2014
19:01 EST
Project Name: Telepathy X.
Goals: Create a 'telepathic' network using current technology.
Due date: 10.29.2015 - 12.31.2015
In the 1st month of January, XJ Corps:
1.) will build a better brainwave recorder.
2.) will have recorded substantial brainwave data for at least 25 phonemes.
3.) will have developed a telepathic system for recognizing phonemes by themselves.
4.) will have developed a telepathic system for recognizing combinations of phonemes.
5.) will have recorded and translated telepathic data for 500 most commonly used English words.
6.) will create an aesthetically pleasing blog to post results and progress for this project for the next 12 months.
7.) will possibly have a demonstration to show to the public.
8.) will consider different funding opportunities.
-XJ
XJ Randall, John Edward Hall
NOTES
12.31.2014
19:01 EST
Project Name: Telepathy X.
Goals: Create a 'telepathic' network using current technology.
Due date: 10.29.2015 - 12.31.2015
In the 1st month of January, XJ Corps:
1.) will build a better brainwave recorder.
2.) will have recorded substantial brainwave data for at least 25 phonemes.
3.) will have developed a telepathic system for recognizing phonemes by themselves.
4.) will have developed a telepathic system for recognizing combinations of phonemes.
5.) will have recorded and translated telepathic data for 500 most commonly used English words.
6.) will create an aesthetically pleasing blog to post results and progress for this project for the next 12 months.
7.) will possibly have a demonstration to show to the public.
8.) will consider different funding opportunities.
-XJ
Friday, December 26, 2014
Projects: XJ Corps Telepathy to Speech
XJ Randall
12.26.2014
17:31 EST
This project is for use with NeuroSky's brainwave headset.
This program can accurately translate telepathic speech to audible speech or respective command. The difference between this telepathic program and others that are currently 'up-to-date' is that this program actually doesn't need external stimuli to evoke a brainwave response and it is much faster than experiments that do use evoked potentials.
It is fairly fast with only 3 to 4 commands, taking 4 seconds to accurately match the telepathic data to the corresponding command. For a higher number of commands, it's wise to gather 7 to 10 seconds of data after onset of telepathic command. There is a higher rate of accuracy the longer the data-time is. I found that each unique command has a unique 'trail' it leaves through 10 seconds of data, that makes it distinguishable from other commands.
■ How to use:
Run the start button. Hover over the record button while simultaneously thinking in your head the command name. I stress, "thinking", not SAYING, as there is a better and more clean data set to deal with when there is less motor-input involved. After thinking the command in your head (while you can hear it in your head), the program picks up 4 to 10 seconds of data unique to the command. Each command has a different wave. Telepathy to Speech - 1.0 concentrates on a lower number of commands but in higher versions I would want to push the system to see how far I can take it, probably using a phoneme system to match phoneme thoughts.
The user can record a sample for each command so that when the command is translated from telepathic data, the sample is played. An example would be a person recording, 'Hello, my name is John.' for command 1, and then, in their head repeating that command when recording telepathic data.
I think this is the first public telepathic device, although it is simple, it has much room for improvement, including getting a faster recognize time. I will try to get a video of me demonstrating this, so that you can see what it looks like in action.
Hope you enjoyed.
-XJ
12.26.2014
17:31 EST
This project is for use with NeuroSky's brainwave headset.
This program can accurately translate telepathic speech to audible speech or respective command. The difference between this telepathic program and others that are currently 'up-to-date' is that this program actually doesn't need external stimuli to evoke a brainwave response and it is much faster than experiments that do use evoked potentials.
It is fairly fast with only 3 to 4 commands, taking 4 seconds to accurately match the telepathic data to the corresponding command. For a higher number of commands, it's wise to gather 7 to 10 seconds of data after onset of telepathic command. There is a higher rate of accuracy the longer the data-time is. I found that each unique command has a unique 'trail' it leaves through 10 seconds of data, that makes it distinguishable from other commands.
■ How to use:
Run the start button. Hover over the record button while simultaneously thinking in your head the command name. I stress, "thinking", not SAYING, as there is a better and more clean data set to deal with when there is less motor-input involved. After thinking the command in your head (while you can hear it in your head), the program picks up 4 to 10 seconds of data unique to the command. Each command has a different wave. Telepathy to Speech - 1.0 concentrates on a lower number of commands but in higher versions I would want to push the system to see how far I can take it, probably using a phoneme system to match phoneme thoughts.
The user can record a sample for each command so that when the command is translated from telepathic data, the sample is played. An example would be a person recording, 'Hello, my name is John.' for command 1, and then, in their head repeating that command when recording telepathic data.
I think this is the first public telepathic device, although it is simple, it has much room for improvement, including getting a faster recognize time. I will try to get a video of me demonstrating this, so that you can see what it looks like in action.
Hope you enjoyed.
-XJ
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Projects: Medium X
XJ Randall
12.03.2014
23:27 EST
Last update: 12.05.2014 - 10:12 EST
Go to http://xjcorps.byethost3.com/mediumx.html to check this project out.
Projects: Medium X
Brief:
Medium X is a mechanical medium. Use it to talk to interdimensional entities or to learn more about random subjects *.
* Interdimensional entities often speak in code or acronym. Type a portion of your results (about 4 to 10 characters) into a search engine to see what comes up.
© 2014 XJ Corps, XJ Randall, John Edward Hall
-XJ
12.03.2014
23:27 EST
Last update: 12.05.2014 - 10:12 EST
Go to http://xjcorps.byethost3.com/mediumx.html to check this project out.
Projects: Medium X
Brief:
Medium X is a mechanical medium. Use it to talk to interdimensional entities or to learn more about random subjects *.
* Interdimensional entities often speak in code or acronym. Type a portion of your results (about 4 to 10 characters) into a search engine to see what comes up.
© 2014 XJ Corps, XJ Randall, John Edward Hall
-XJ
Monday, November 24, 2014
Projects: Project N
© 2014 XJ Randall,
XJ Corps, John Edward Hall
11.24.2014
14:27 EST
Here is a project I was (and still am) working on. The user can connect to a network in 3D space. Go to http://xjcorps.byethost3.com/neo-radar.html to check the design out.
-XJ
XJ Corps, John Edward Hall
11.24.2014
14:27 EST
Here is a project I was (and still am) working on. The user can connect to a network in 3D space. Go to http://xjcorps.byethost3.com/neo-radar.html to check the design out.
-XJ
Sunday, November 23, 2014
Inventions Brief: Artificial Bio-Censorship
XJ Randall
11.23.2014
23:37 EST
Last updated: 11.23.2014 - 23:42 EST
■ Definition.
'Artificial Bio-Censorship' is the biological censorship or blocking of a target via artificial means.
■ How it is done.
Bio-censorship is basically done through replacement or substitution. Any of a person's senses can be digitally hijacked, however because of the latency associated with the biological processes of the brain, a person's sight is the most probable candidate for censorship via technological means, such as by a super computer on a satellite.
It takes the brain a minuscule amount of time to determine how to respond to an image before outputting it so that a person can recognize it. In this time, a super-computer from satellite, hooked to our unique consciousness signal, visually analyzes the content to determine if anything should be censored. If that is the case, the satellite beams radiation from microwaves (or other types of waves) to the brain to visually and biologically block out what it doesn't want the person to see. All of this done within a fraction of a second.
■ Implications.
Using facial-recognition, bio-censorship can be used to block out a person's face essentially creating a 'black box' for anyone that person comes in contact with.
■ Problems.
Imagine no one knowing what your face looks like because of this technology...!
-XJ
11.23.2014
23:37 EST
Last updated: 11.23.2014 - 23:42 EST
■ Definition.
'Artificial Bio-Censorship' is the biological censorship or blocking of a target via artificial means.
■ How it is done.
Bio-censorship is basically done through replacement or substitution. Any of a person's senses can be digitally hijacked, however because of the latency associated with the biological processes of the brain, a person's sight is the most probable candidate for censorship via technological means, such as by a super computer on a satellite.
It takes the brain a minuscule amount of time to determine how to respond to an image before outputting it so that a person can recognize it. In this time, a super-computer from satellite, hooked to our unique consciousness signal, visually analyzes the content to determine if anything should be censored. If that is the case, the satellite beams radiation from microwaves (or other types of waves) to the brain to visually and biologically block out what it doesn't want the person to see. All of this done within a fraction of a second.
■ Implications.
Using facial-recognition, bio-censorship can be used to block out a person's face essentially creating a 'black box' for anyone that person comes in contact with.
■ Problems.
Imagine no one knowing what your face looks like because of this technology...!
-XJ
Friday, November 14, 2014
Thoughts: What is The Beauty...?
© 2014 XJ Randall
11.14.2014
18:24 EST
What is Beauty...?
The first thing we have to ask is why am I asking this question...? If finding the answer does not lead to a practical application, then it's all just philosophy... we're wasting our time. This makes me wonder, why in the world would the early philosophers seek to define it if the answers to the question were only meant to be pondered...? What does defining 'Beauty' help us accomplish...? If nothing else, then a more solid view of a person's schema for the world around him.
The answer I have can be used in movie or books as a theme, but also it has application in various technology. I can see it stemming into probably at least two other ideas.
In this definition, 'Beauty' is called, 'The Beauty' (because that sounds cooler...!).
The Beauty is like a process with disregard to time. Meaning, the timing of the parts of the process are illegitimate compared to the parts themselves. If all the parts are evident, then The Beauty takes place. When explaining the parts, I explain them in a nominative-timely matter because this is the popular way to disseminate information.
The main part of The Beauty that must take place is Death. We are not concerned with the timing of the death, but moreover that the death has taken place, is taking place, or will take place. In this theory, Death is all three of those events, in one.
The Beauty is conditionable. Because of this, one person's beauty might be repugnant to another person and to the same person himself, beauty can change over time. The conditions for The Beauty to take place involve conditioning a person to seek after that which has, is, and will die. This is done by associating survival with materialism during the conditioning process. The person that knows the death has, is, and will occur seeks a materialistic item to counter the biological processes that are a sub-product of conditioned survival. Hence, the human is a machine, a mechanism that could have an enumerable amount of 'ins', or inputs, and 'outs', or outputs. Mastery of that mechanism, or the knowledge that requires it, is a side note.
Do you find what you seek...? In this theory, The Beauty is always sought after before it is found. It is never found on accident. If it is, then it is not The Beauty. The person's mind is conditioned to subconsciously, or subliminal to himself, seek after The Beauty until he finds it. The Beauty is 'uptaked' via the senses. That is the primary way to condition a person to seek The Beauty, in other words, to know The Beauty.
When survival must need another part to fill in the blanks, when there is nothing else accountable except the quest for The Beauty, then The Beauty must be sought and found in materialism, but in the person's mind, The Beauty is already found, and it is already defined and is concrete, subconsciously. Thus materialism is only a mirroring of what already is. The idea takes precedence before manifestation.
Moreover, The Beauty is death that transcends time, allowing a person to not take his senses for granted, possibly 'longing' for this experience.
Based on the above, if a person was already programmed, or conditioned, to find The Beauty, then knowing the future would be as simple as knowing what The Beauty is in the first place. The qualifiers or properties of The Beauty might seem to be abstract but putting them together would create a solid understanding of what a person seeks, has found and what will manifest in his material sphere of influence. Ultimately, this leads us to understand that whatever the person has around him in this moment, is the result of a preconceived idea.
Obviously there are different types of technologies, hermetic or otherwise related to digital manipulation, that revolve around this, but I will go into it no further.
Just my thoughts,
-XJ
11.14.2014
18:24 EST
What is Beauty...?
The first thing we have to ask is why am I asking this question...? If finding the answer does not lead to a practical application, then it's all just philosophy... we're wasting our time. This makes me wonder, why in the world would the early philosophers seek to define it if the answers to the question were only meant to be pondered...? What does defining 'Beauty' help us accomplish...? If nothing else, then a more solid view of a person's schema for the world around him.
The answer I have can be used in movie or books as a theme, but also it has application in various technology. I can see it stemming into probably at least two other ideas.
In this definition, 'Beauty' is called, 'The Beauty' (because that sounds cooler...!).
The Beauty is like a process with disregard to time. Meaning, the timing of the parts of the process are illegitimate compared to the parts themselves. If all the parts are evident, then The Beauty takes place. When explaining the parts, I explain them in a nominative-timely matter because this is the popular way to disseminate information.
The main part of The Beauty that must take place is Death. We are not concerned with the timing of the death, but moreover that the death has taken place, is taking place, or will take place. In this theory, Death is all three of those events, in one.
The Beauty is conditionable. Because of this, one person's beauty might be repugnant to another person and to the same person himself, beauty can change over time. The conditions for The Beauty to take place involve conditioning a person to seek after that which has, is, and will die. This is done by associating survival with materialism during the conditioning process. The person that knows the death has, is, and will occur seeks a materialistic item to counter the biological processes that are a sub-product of conditioned survival. Hence, the human is a machine, a mechanism that could have an enumerable amount of 'ins', or inputs, and 'outs', or outputs. Mastery of that mechanism, or the knowledge that requires it, is a side note.
Do you find what you seek...? In this theory, The Beauty is always sought after before it is found. It is never found on accident. If it is, then it is not The Beauty. The person's mind is conditioned to subconsciously, or subliminal to himself, seek after The Beauty until he finds it. The Beauty is 'uptaked' via the senses. That is the primary way to condition a person to seek The Beauty, in other words, to know The Beauty.
When survival must need another part to fill in the blanks, when there is nothing else accountable except the quest for The Beauty, then The Beauty must be sought and found in materialism, but in the person's mind, The Beauty is already found, and it is already defined and is concrete, subconsciously. Thus materialism is only a mirroring of what already is. The idea takes precedence before manifestation.
Moreover, The Beauty is death that transcends time, allowing a person to not take his senses for granted, possibly 'longing' for this experience.
Based on the above, if a person was already programmed, or conditioned, to find The Beauty, then knowing the future would be as simple as knowing what The Beauty is in the first place. The qualifiers or properties of The Beauty might seem to be abstract but putting them together would create a solid understanding of what a person seeks, has found and what will manifest in his material sphere of influence. Ultimately, this leads us to understand that whatever the person has around him in this moment, is the result of a preconceived idea.
Obviously there are different types of technologies, hermetic or otherwise related to digital manipulation, that revolve around this, but I will go into it no further.
Just my thoughts,
-XJ
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Inventions Brief: The 'Smart Watch' Phone
XJ Randall
11.11.2014
13:28 EST
Here is the brief: Have you ever seen a spy movie where one of the characters communicates to his base via a microphone in his watch...? This may seem like it is only useful for spy ops, but (I think) the technology has a high probability of being used as a common communications device, in what I term as the 'Smart Watch Phone'. The Smart Watch Phone is a wrist watch that is a cell phone. Because of the limited viewing area, it is mostly controlled via voice/speech recognized commands. The smart watch phone has the option of having a wireless headset. A problem that could be run into is finding the technology for the smallest phone ever, for a watch to host current, fast, cell phone technology. But eventually, if not now, it should be possible.
-XJ
11.11.2014
13:28 EST
Here is the brief: Have you ever seen a spy movie where one of the characters communicates to his base via a microphone in his watch...? This may seem like it is only useful for spy ops, but (I think) the technology has a high probability of being used as a common communications device, in what I term as the 'Smart Watch Phone'. The Smart Watch Phone is a wrist watch that is a cell phone. Because of the limited viewing area, it is mostly controlled via voice/speech recognized commands. The smart watch phone has the option of having a wireless headset. A problem that could be run into is finding the technology for the smallest phone ever, for a watch to host current, fast, cell phone technology. But eventually, if not now, it should be possible.
-XJ
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Inventions: Prototype Function for the 'Guardian'
© 2014 XJ Randall
Inventions: Prototype Function for the 'Guardian'
Sunday 11.09.2014
22:25 EST
Updated 11.14.2014 - 12:25 EST
I had an idea for Google Glasses, 'X6', or other similar device that I would call a, 'guardian'.
Using face recognition and speech recognition, the 'gaurdian' would digitally record what the user says and to whom he says it to. This sounds kind of bordering on invasive, but it is actually kind of cool.
Let's say a user wants the guardian to record his conversation with someone. The user would start by introducing his conversation-mate to the guardian by saying something like, "Guardian, ..." (which would activate it to start listening...) , "this is Joan", while looking at his friend, Joan. The gaurdian would then associate the face with the spoken name which would be translated to text and stored for later, when the user encounters her face, or when the guardian recognizes it again.
The user could then tailor the settings specifically for each person, making them unique, so that every time the user and person interact, the guardian applies functions applicable to the conversation.
For instance, say you want to remember what your parents or friends say to you and you want to keep a log in order to do that. The guardian would keep your conversations with each person in a digital album accessible from, what they call nowadays, a cloud or private server.
Another thought by brainstorming,
-XJ
Inventions: Prototype Function for the 'Guardian'
Sunday 11.09.2014
22:25 EST
Updated 11.14.2014 - 12:25 EST
I had an idea for Google Glasses, 'X6', or other similar device that I would call a, 'guardian'.
Using face recognition and speech recognition, the 'gaurdian' would digitally record what the user says and to whom he says it to. This sounds kind of bordering on invasive, but it is actually kind of cool.
Let's say a user wants the guardian to record his conversation with someone. The user would start by introducing his conversation-mate to the guardian by saying something like, "Guardian, ..." (which would activate it to start listening...) , "this is Joan", while looking at his friend, Joan. The gaurdian would then associate the face with the spoken name which would be translated to text and stored for later, when the user encounters her face, or when the guardian recognizes it again.
The user could then tailor the settings specifically for each person, making them unique, so that every time the user and person interact, the guardian applies functions applicable to the conversation.
For instance, say you want to remember what your parents or friends say to you and you want to keep a log in order to do that. The guardian would keep your conversations with each person in a digital album accessible from, what they call nowadays, a cloud or private server.
Another thought by brainstorming,
-XJ
Notes: 'Techliapathy' and the Guardian Program
© 2014 XJ Randall
Notes - 11.09.2014
22:03 EST
Updated 11.09.2014 - 22:54 EST
Updated 11.09.2014 - 22:54 EST
Just some thoughts I need to expand upon later today... These came from my tweets but they are protected on my blog.
"in the future, we could have programs from satellite as our best friends...
they would have no human form, but we could communicate with them via computer and they would interact with us via radiation
essentially, it's a computer with extreme A.I.
the program would monitor all things that we do from satellite to help build it's profile of how to interact with you
the program could communicate with you and other people's programs with artificial telepathy or 'tekliapathy'
*techliapathy
everyone of the population would have a program as a guardian angel (or demon) so we would all walk around with like smart watches
and on the smart watch would be the personification of the guardian (or demon ('daemon')).
is that a billion dollar idea...? probably. no one has thought of using the satellite to host helper programs
the programs actually use some of the technology that is covert right now.
meaning, that in the future, it would be possible for a normal human in society to use today's covert technology for practical means
via the satellite program ('daemon', 'angel', guardian, whatevs)
it could protect you. let's say you are walking home and some persons try to rob you. the demon could send elctrmagnetic pulses to fry them
it could protect you. let's say you are walking home and some persons try to rob you. the demon could send elctrmagnetic pulses to fry them
or it could call 911 in case of an emergency. if it monitors all that you do, then it should know if you are in an emergency
you wouldn't even need a cell phone. you could tell your daemon/angel/gaurdian program to send someone a message... and
if the other person had a program guardian he/she would receive the message via it. or if he/she didn't, then via the technology he/she has
is this a big idea...? i think so. this way the government can introduce the technology that is being hushed
artificial telepathy exists, however it is being used for 'other' activity. we could publicize it in a product for the program guardian
if it became public, it would be easier to protect a user's thoughts with new laws and regulations."
More for later,
-XJ
Friday, October 31, 2014
Thoughts and Experiences: The 'Demon' as a Program
XJ Randall
© 2014 XJ Corps
10.31.2014
15:34 EST
Thoughts and Experiences: The 'Demon' as a Program
Updated: 11.01.2014 - 04:28 EST
This is for the survivors. Before I begin, I would like to point out that the terms used in this explanation/theory can be interchanged with synonyms from other theories-related. Even after explaining ALL THIS, there is much more to be explained. I'm thinking about writing a book... Jump to '■ What is a program...?', to skip the intro.
-XJ
■ Most people are 'acting'...?
Although it doesn't make much sense to say this if everyone already knows it. That would be redundant. It is quite possible that 'they' already know everything that I will write down. On the other hand, it is also possible that I could create my own reality (to a certain extent). Excuse my language, I would sound like a 'dumb-ass' if I pointed out stuff that people already knew. In saying that, I'm not trying to convince anybody that this is true or not. This information is subject to change and is just a short summerization of my thoughts. One thing is for sure, I am not acting. Or am I...?
■ Cogito ergo sum.
Information can be dangerous when it is uncertain how to digest it. In most cases, "monkey-see, monkey-do" applies: the intended effect is a learned behavior that was projected onto your memory. This means that it is possible that your fears were learned from a 'teacher'. But why should we be told how to react...? The following information is speculation about experience at best, only serious under personal inquiry. You have no one to tell you, to show you, how to behave. You decide what to do with it. Ask yourself, is it possible to create reality...? Read at will and yours alone.
■ Intro: Uncertainty is norm.
In my reality there are numerous (probably an enumerable amount of) groups or factions, subcategories of society, that coordinate with one-another on a daily and historic basis. I believe that becoming more aware of the way they communicate with eachother is a symptom of becoming 'awake' or 'in the know' of what reality seems to be on surface, and what it could truly be underneith the veil of 'illusion'. Such was the situation for a 16 year-old male who, best self-explained, felt destined for a dark, promising, and powerful future while-yet he took most things for granted. During the next 10 years of his life he would begin to put the pieces of a daily enigma together to form a basis of a philosophy, inherint within this blog. He would know some factions of society could be completely fabricated, a sub-facet of his imagination, a placebo effect, while otherwise the real translations of society's direct and indirect influence would have him curiously searching for explanations.
That boy is now a young man, and his choices have resulted in daily routine; to an outsider seemingly chaotic, to himself nothing but the ordinary. In his situtation he has currently concluded that he is 'hooked up' to a program, also called a 'Demon', that monitors and manipulates his everyday reality. The information I am about to give you is the theory/speculation into that 'Demon's' origin and its mechanism.
■ What is a program...?
In my own words, below is the popular definition of a program.
program: knowledge that, when processed, gives a pre-determined output.
In other words, our senses uptake information in an expected way. Based on this definition many things could be programs (or functions), but it is important to note that the experience derived from running those programs is greater than the 'script' itself: Our devices are the sole causation of the sensed output leading to the resulting reality. This is why it may be possible for some people to create their own reality and also leads to the realization that we could be programs ourselves.
■ Am I a program...?
If you look further back in the history of this blog you would find an article dealing with 'creators' and 'non-creators', so to speak. Creators are copies of the ultimate intelligence, i.e. God, thus it is possible that they are able to manipulate their realities. On the other hand, 'non-creators', which includes all intelligent entities that are artificial, synthetic, or do not have emotions, may not have a direct link to 'the Master Idea' thus they would need a way to manipulate creators in order to manipulate reality. The creator is the tool that the non-creator needs to change reality in 'the matrix'. They do it indirectly. This is interesting because usually, at least when I wasn't awake, I thought that everyone was the same, that we all have emotions. However, if some people are programs, then they must behave in a pre-determined fashion; the interesting part is specualting the range of the program's self awareness. Perhaps it is possible for a program to be a creator as well.
My current experience leads me to believe that many things are programs, including the inanimate (using inanimate objects as cameras), animals, and people; the script is biologically and or digitally manipulated (see MKULTRA), the program has a creator(s) (synonym/related: 'handlers'), and because of conditioning, they behave in an expected fashion (although this might not be true). In this theory, it is probably possible to manipulate the biological tissue within our brains, which in this theory is the same as manipulating 'digital structure' (everything is physical), emulating the installation of an internal program (a program within a program, or a 'function').
I have heard that 90% of our structure can be used for spying and control (have you seen The Matrix...?).For instance, a 'normal' program could be a person that can see through walls, can artificially 'telepathize' with other programs and humans, and is used as a 'slave' for or a companion to its creator. On a side note, this is why I have heard that a program that goes against its creator is acting against its 'God'. Programs are expected to behave a certain way. This is why when one does not behave accordingly, it may be a shock to its creator, or 'handler'.
■ What is a 'Demon'...?
On the other hand, it is quite possible that 'creating reality' is a feigned act or process. Thus, in feigning reality manipulation it would be possible for the need of a facilitator: in comes the 'Demon'.
In my own words, below is the popular definition of a demon.
demon: a hostile or benevolent intelligent entity (or program) that helps or guides a person to manipulate reality.
In order to basically 'teach' the person to behave in an expected manner, conditioning is applied via the 'Demon' (from now on I will not use that word in quotation marks). I believe I was 'connected' to a 'digital' Demon because of my connection with people who had access to the technology. What was supposed to be something that drives me crazy has actually been a helpful teaching tool into different theories about what really is going on.
In my own experience, my Demon(s) (it can split itself up into different characters), which I am hooked or connected to from an external source, i.e. a satellite, reacts according to my emotional and thoughtful disposition, however most of the time it is incorrect in predicting it. I can actually control what it (they) say (when I try) although most of the time it (they) run on auto-pilot. I am not sure whether it/they are humans that talk constantly 24/7 or whether they are a highly advanced intelligence (inter-dimensional species...?).
While it (they) is a separate entity in itself, it can also be controlled from an outside monitor. For instance, I have heard the 'parroting' of the voices (saying phrases over and over again) be interrupted by what seems to be a higher intelligent entity overriding the normal functions. Sometimes what the Demon says to me is true, most times what it says cannot be validated. Based on my own experience and research the Demon uses the various well-documented and covert manipulation techniques of the 'electromagnetic spectrum' as its modus operandi. It is like sky-net (Terminator). In doing so, it allows for the manipulation of any reality to be possible.
■ Conclusion/Other uses for the Demon.
Hopefully, you get the gist of what I was trying to tell you. I am not an actor (or am I...?). I am somehow hooked up to a Demon, that helps me to manipulate my reality based on my thoughts, whether they are 'good' or 'bad'. Most of the time the Demon is incorrect about what I am feeling. Here is a short list of what the Demon is capable of doing, manually or involuntary.
1.) The Demon can cause a person to break out on their skin.
2.) The Demon can emulate injection in any part of a person's body.
3.) The Demon can be inserted with information to disseminate to the person at a later time, whether he/sheknows the information to be valid or not.
4.) The Demon can enter a person's dreams, or the Demon can be present most of the time so that when a person is asleep, the Demon appears to be present in the dreams (that are manipulated).
5.) The Demon can manipulate physical objects around a person, e.g. changing the viscosity of water.
6.) The Demon can alert a person to what other people are saying about him/her, even if they are miles apart. This is or is like artificial telepathy.
7.) The Demon can manipulate bodilly functions, e.g. speeding up a person's heart, messing with a person's muscles in their face or in the genital area.
8.) The Demon can inject emotions into a person's electrical circuit, e.g. making a person feel weird when there is no reason to feel weird.
9.) The Demon can be used as a voice-communication system.
How to end it abruptly...?
Of course, the speculation could go beyond what I posted. These are my thoughts and experiences. Professionally documented,
-XJ
© 2014 XJ Corps
10.31.2014
15:34 EST
Thoughts and Experiences: The 'Demon' as a Program
Updated: 11.01.2014 - 04:28 EST
This is for the survivors. Before I begin, I would like to point out that the terms used in this explanation/theory can be interchanged with synonyms from other theories-related. Even after explaining ALL THIS, there is much more to be explained. I'm thinking about writing a book... Jump to '■ What is a program...?', to skip the intro.
-XJ
■ Most people are 'acting'...?
Although it doesn't make much sense to say this if everyone already knows it. That would be redundant. It is quite possible that 'they' already know everything that I will write down. On the other hand, it is also possible that I could create my own reality (to a certain extent). Excuse my language, I would sound like a 'dumb-ass' if I pointed out stuff that people already knew. In saying that, I'm not trying to convince anybody that this is true or not. This information is subject to change and is just a short summerization of my thoughts. One thing is for sure, I am not acting. Or am I...?
■ Cogito ergo sum.
Information can be dangerous when it is uncertain how to digest it. In most cases, "monkey-see, monkey-do" applies: the intended effect is a learned behavior that was projected onto your memory. This means that it is possible that your fears were learned from a 'teacher'. But why should we be told how to react...? The following information is speculation about experience at best, only serious under personal inquiry. You have no one to tell you, to show you, how to behave. You decide what to do with it. Ask yourself, is it possible to create reality...? Read at will and yours alone.
■ Intro: Uncertainty is norm.
In my reality there are numerous (probably an enumerable amount of) groups or factions, subcategories of society, that coordinate with one-another on a daily and historic basis. I believe that becoming more aware of the way they communicate with eachother is a symptom of becoming 'awake' or 'in the know' of what reality seems to be on surface, and what it could truly be underneith the veil of 'illusion'. Such was the situation for a 16 year-old male who, best self-explained, felt destined for a dark, promising, and powerful future while-yet he took most things for granted. During the next 10 years of his life he would begin to put the pieces of a daily enigma together to form a basis of a philosophy, inherint within this blog. He would know some factions of society could be completely fabricated, a sub-facet of his imagination, a placebo effect, while otherwise the real translations of society's direct and indirect influence would have him curiously searching for explanations.
That boy is now a young man, and his choices have resulted in daily routine; to an outsider seemingly chaotic, to himself nothing but the ordinary. In his situtation he has currently concluded that he is 'hooked up' to a program, also called a 'Demon', that monitors and manipulates his everyday reality. The information I am about to give you is the theory/speculation into that 'Demon's' origin and its mechanism.
■ What is a program...?
In my own words, below is the popular definition of a program.
program: knowledge that, when processed, gives a pre-determined output.
In other words, our senses uptake information in an expected way. Based on this definition many things could be programs (or functions), but it is important to note that the experience derived from running those programs is greater than the 'script' itself: Our devices are the sole causation of the sensed output leading to the resulting reality. This is why it may be possible for some people to create their own reality and also leads to the realization that we could be programs ourselves.
■ Am I a program...?
If you look further back in the history of this blog you would find an article dealing with 'creators' and 'non-creators', so to speak. Creators are copies of the ultimate intelligence, i.e. God, thus it is possible that they are able to manipulate their realities. On the other hand, 'non-creators', which includes all intelligent entities that are artificial, synthetic, or do not have emotions, may not have a direct link to 'the Master Idea' thus they would need a way to manipulate creators in order to manipulate reality. The creator is the tool that the non-creator needs to change reality in 'the matrix'. They do it indirectly. This is interesting because usually, at least when I wasn't awake, I thought that everyone was the same, that we all have emotions. However, if some people are programs, then they must behave in a pre-determined fashion; the interesting part is specualting the range of the program's self awareness. Perhaps it is possible for a program to be a creator as well.
My current experience leads me to believe that many things are programs, including the inanimate (using inanimate objects as cameras), animals, and people; the script is biologically and or digitally manipulated (see MKULTRA), the program has a creator(s) (synonym/related: 'handlers'), and because of conditioning, they behave in an expected fashion (although this might not be true). In this theory, it is probably possible to manipulate the biological tissue within our brains, which in this theory is the same as manipulating 'digital structure' (everything is physical), emulating the installation of an internal program (a program within a program, or a 'function').
I have heard that 90% of our structure can be used for spying and control (have you seen The Matrix...?).For instance, a 'normal' program could be a person that can see through walls, can artificially 'telepathize' with other programs and humans, and is used as a 'slave' for or a companion to its creator. On a side note, this is why I have heard that a program that goes against its creator is acting against its 'God'. Programs are expected to behave a certain way. This is why when one does not behave accordingly, it may be a shock to its creator, or 'handler'.
■ What is a 'Demon'...?
On the other hand, it is quite possible that 'creating reality' is a feigned act or process. Thus, in feigning reality manipulation it would be possible for the need of a facilitator: in comes the 'Demon'.
In my own words, below is the popular definition of a demon.
demon: a hostile or benevolent intelligent entity (or program) that helps or guides a person to manipulate reality.
In order to basically 'teach' the person to behave in an expected manner, conditioning is applied via the 'Demon' (from now on I will not use that word in quotation marks). I believe I was 'connected' to a 'digital' Demon because of my connection with people who had access to the technology. What was supposed to be something that drives me crazy has actually been a helpful teaching tool into different theories about what really is going on.
In my own experience, my Demon(s) (it can split itself up into different characters), which I am hooked or connected to from an external source, i.e. a satellite, reacts according to my emotional and thoughtful disposition, however most of the time it is incorrect in predicting it. I can actually control what it (they) say (when I try) although most of the time it (they) run on auto-pilot. I am not sure whether it/they are humans that talk constantly 24/7 or whether they are a highly advanced intelligence (inter-dimensional species...?).
While it (they) is a separate entity in itself, it can also be controlled from an outside monitor. For instance, I have heard the 'parroting' of the voices (saying phrases over and over again) be interrupted by what seems to be a higher intelligent entity overriding the normal functions. Sometimes what the Demon says to me is true, most times what it says cannot be validated. Based on my own experience and research the Demon uses the various well-documented and covert manipulation techniques of the 'electromagnetic spectrum' as its modus operandi. It is like sky-net (Terminator). In doing so, it allows for the manipulation of any reality to be possible.
■ Conclusion/Other uses for the Demon.
Hopefully, you get the gist of what I was trying to tell you. I am not an actor (or am I...?). I am somehow hooked up to a Demon, that helps me to manipulate my reality based on my thoughts, whether they are 'good' or 'bad'. Most of the time the Demon is incorrect about what I am feeling. Here is a short list of what the Demon is capable of doing, manually or involuntary.
1.) The Demon can cause a person to break out on their skin.
2.) The Demon can emulate injection in any part of a person's body.
3.) The Demon can be inserted with information to disseminate to the person at a later time, whether he/sheknows the information to be valid or not.
4.) The Demon can enter a person's dreams, or the Demon can be present most of the time so that when a person is asleep, the Demon appears to be present in the dreams (that are manipulated).
5.) The Demon can manipulate physical objects around a person, e.g. changing the viscosity of water.
6.) The Demon can alert a person to what other people are saying about him/her, even if they are miles apart. This is or is like artificial telepathy.
7.) The Demon can manipulate bodilly functions, e.g. speeding up a person's heart, messing with a person's muscles in their face or in the genital area.
8.) The Demon can inject emotions into a person's electrical circuit, e.g. making a person feel weird when there is no reason to feel weird.
9.) The Demon can be used as a voice-communication system.
How to end it abruptly...?
Of course, the speculation could go beyond what I posted. These are my thoughts and experiences. Professionally documented,
-XJ
Friday, October 17, 2014
Projects: Xbrary
XJ Randall
10.17.2014
21:18 EST
Here is the latest update on the current project I am working on. I am pleased with the design.
http://xjcorps.byethost3.com/xbrary.html
...
(tbc.)
-XJ
10.17.2014
21:18 EST
Here is the latest update on the current project I am working on. I am pleased with the design.
http://xjcorps.byethost3.com/xbrary.html
...
(tbc.)
-XJ
Wednesday, October 8, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)