First, the title could be better. Now, read this short story. I wrote it so you could understand what I'm talking about when I explain what I'm talking about. Be forewarned, it's a little bit graphic. But it gets the point across.
"A perfectly calm and self righteous man is walking in the forest, alone and by himself. He's hiking in one of the most remote places in the world. Hours away from civilization, he has a two week pack on his back, complete with fold out tents, water supply, water filtration devices, food full of protein, fire-starters, an extra set of clothes... I don't know, you know what I mean, the consumerist kind of things that go with these kind of ventures. Everything he needs he's got. It seems as if he's all set for survival. Especially knowing that he's an expert on this stuff. He's walking up a boulder filled hill when he sights a boulder that looks like it has some kind of... well, something written into it. Like it is etched or something. The man is intrigued, so he gets closer to find out it is an etching of a cross. Just a cross, like a plus sign. The man hesitates to move for a minute. It looks as if he's trying to interpret the sign. All of a sudden the man takes off his backpack, removes his knife from its holder and slits his throat. The man dies there, never to see or be seen by anyone ever again..."
You might wonder why I would write such a grotesque story, that seemingly has no meaning to it. I began thinking about why and how people believe or perceive what they want within certain circumstances. For instance, if I was an artist and created a masterpiece that was rejected by the public, why did they reject it...? Did I have any say in whether it was to be rejected, or is it entirely out of my control how the public perceives my work...? Who's at fault for the meaning behind an image, the person projecting it or the person perceiving it...?
Obviously, anybody can assign any meaning to anything. Anybody can think anything about anything. However, at what point is it that the person who etched into the rock ultimately has total control over what is construed or communicated...? It all comes down to, I think, the difference between control relies on what we allow ourselves to be emotionally evoked by. That is, there are two or three modes of control in life: maintaining control over oneself by not giving control to other people, giving control to other people by not maintaining control over oneself, and getting control from other people by their subsequent dis-maintaining control of themselves, or in other words, getting control from other people by them giving it to you.
It is interesting to think about. You're probably thinking, "What does this have to do with the man slitting his throat...?" Exactly. Why did the man slit his throat over seemingly just looking at the etched cross...? Perhaps the cross had meaning that we can not comprehend. One could argue that it is a travesty for such a thing to happen and that it was entirely the man's fault for choosing to do so, even though we don't know why. However, one could also argue that the fault and culpability is on the person that etched the cross into the rock in the first place, for without the cross the man would not have killed himself...
more explanation here...
I will let you in on a secret. The man that etched the cross into the boulder was the same man that interpreted it, and died thereafter. What does that make you think...? Interesting isn't it...? Why would a man react to something so strongly that he created...? Think what you will.
Now, I will bullet point some of the stuff I've been thinking about...
1.) We cannot give anyone control over us unless we choose to be emotionally evoked by the stimuli that is presented or the image that is projected. I.E. There is no image unless we perceive there to be.
2.) We can make the argument that some emotions are evoked automatically without our control, i.e. they are biological processes. Fight or flight response is an example.
3.) If a criminal killed someone's daughter, and the parent became irate, is it the parent's choice for becoming irate, or did the criminal force the parent to become irate...? This question leads me to believe that we are the ultimate determining factor in whether we give control to other people or maintain our control. Hence, it is a choice. We choose to give control, or we choose to keep our control.
4.) In Propaganda, the difference in getting control from other people, as opposed to not making a difference at all, relies on how ignorant the host is. The more educated we become, the less control we give to other people...
...(TBC)
Well, this wasn't very well written. But it's an idea...
-XJ
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Monday, January 14, 2013
Thoughts: In Our Darkest Hours
Who says we can't help...? Whether you choose to 'believe' in a God or not, help is a sovereign gift. It is innate. We all have it. We all have power to give it. Even if we have to help ourselves. Sometimes, scientifically, religiously, psychologically, within any frame of measurement, sometimes the only person in the world possible to help you is yourself. So if you don't believe in yourself, no one will. Where there is one, there are two. One is an infinite times greater than zero. Think of the spark that started the universe. If there was no spark, then how would the greatness of the universe exist as we know it...? If you don't believe in yourself how can others...? Where there is one, there are two. You have to be that one spark. You have to be that first spark before the universe expands. Where there is one, there are two. Be the first to believe in yourself and others will too. One is an infinite times greater than zero. In the darkest hours in our weakest state we are able to use our sovereign gifts, our abilities to make more difference than any other time in our life. The difference lies in what we choose to do with that ability...
Don't let other people's doubts bring you down. Don't let you bring you down. Know better than skepticism. Believe that you can do it, even when you are most hopeless, because it is at the time when we are most hopeless, that we have the ability to make the most difference...
-XJ
Don't let other people's doubts bring you down. Don't let you bring you down. Know better than skepticism. Believe that you can do it, even when you are most hopeless, because it is at the time when we are most hopeless, that we have the ability to make the most difference...
-XJ
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
My Mind Projection Thesis
Mind Projection Thesis
by XJ Hall
I believe that for whatever physical entity one possesses and utilizes, one ultimately has physical memory to go along with it. I believe that dreams are the recorded and repeated physical memories of those physical entities. Thus, a person who is able to utilize his sight with eyes would be able to 'see' dreams and a person who is able to utilize his sense of touch with hands would be able to 'feel' dreams. I believe that the mind is the focalization of all of one's physical memories. I believe that memories are physicalities and thus they are able to be detected. This leads me to believe that in order to project memories from the mind to an external audience one must de-encrypt the physical memories by recording the detected energy reacting with them, running the recorded data through a cipher, and reassembling the feedback into a visual-perceivable or other physical-presentable order.
-XJ
-XJ
Thoughts: Lack of Intelligence Leads to Perfection
The biggest revelation of all is to find out that what you are part of, no matter how intricate your role, the relevancy of your existence is a matter of mere interpretation. Maybe I didn't word that very well. I began thinking, there is no Real Meaning. There are only forces, that push us one way or the other. We exist, like animals, part of the circle of life, or the Master Idea. We are (morphus?) forms that perpetually move throughout the 'air' like the oil in a lava-lamp. And we don't have any more control over our impulses than an elk in the forest. But we believe we do. We have insight into our own behavior. Hence meaning. But I argue, meaning is only the result of intelligence. Intelligence, however, is not sovereign. Contrary to popular belief, I argue that intelligence is far from perfection. It is the lack of perfection. The opposite of perfection.
The energies in an unintelligent system move to and fro, hither and tither, without questioning their dominance over other energies. They are psychic in their ability to predict where to go next without predicting it. It is perfect harmony, a unanimous conscious, how you say, Yin and Yang. Everything compliments each other. That's the Master Idea. Everything exists, and is because it is, without self contradiction. Yet, even still having intelligence, we are part of the Master Idea. We are not sovereign, it is only our intelligence that makes us think so. It is only our intelligence that makes us find meaning in everything we do. The reality is, there is no Real Meaning. Only Forces that push us one way or the other.
Have you ever solved a very complex problem in your dreams...? I'm sure you have but you don't remember it. A way to think about how I am trying to explain this is to think about a normal human who is awake. It is more difficult to solve problems because of something called latent inhibition. I'm no expert on it, I heard about it a while back. Basically, the farther we drift into the subconscious, what I call the Master Idea, the easier it becomes to solve problems. The easier it is to become part of the Master Idea. When we are in this state we can predict things without predicting them. What I mean is, in order to predict something there has to be a certain level of uncertainty. Most likely time gets in way. But when we are part of the Master Idea, we know what happens because it happens in the same time frame. In fact there is no time in the Master Idea. Everything exists in the NOW. In the Master Idea, we don't predict what happens, we are part of what happens.
So when we are sleeping or half asleep and are more part of the Master Idea, our latent inhibition is way down, therefore we can solve the most complex of problems.
Unfortunately, we can't remember them. This is where new technology comes in. Based on my mind projection thesis, in the future, we will be able to record our thoughts, the pictures in our mind, and the music as well. We will be able to drift into our subconscious and solve complex problems (because of low latent inhibition) while recording them.
...
-XJ
The energies in an unintelligent system move to and fro, hither and tither, without questioning their dominance over other energies. They are psychic in their ability to predict where to go next without predicting it. It is perfect harmony, a unanimous conscious, how you say, Yin and Yang. Everything compliments each other. That's the Master Idea. Everything exists, and is because it is, without self contradiction. Yet, even still having intelligence, we are part of the Master Idea. We are not sovereign, it is only our intelligence that makes us think so. It is only our intelligence that makes us find meaning in everything we do. The reality is, there is no Real Meaning. Only Forces that push us one way or the other.
Have you ever solved a very complex problem in your dreams...? I'm sure you have but you don't remember it. A way to think about how I am trying to explain this is to think about a normal human who is awake. It is more difficult to solve problems because of something called latent inhibition. I'm no expert on it, I heard about it a while back. Basically, the farther we drift into the subconscious, what I call the Master Idea, the easier it becomes to solve problems. The easier it is to become part of the Master Idea. When we are in this state we can predict things without predicting them. What I mean is, in order to predict something there has to be a certain level of uncertainty. Most likely time gets in way. But when we are part of the Master Idea, we know what happens because it happens in the same time frame. In fact there is no time in the Master Idea. Everything exists in the NOW. In the Master Idea, we don't predict what happens, we are part of what happens.
So when we are sleeping or half asleep and are more part of the Master Idea, our latent inhibition is way down, therefore we can solve the most complex of problems.
Unfortunately, we can't remember them. This is where new technology comes in. Based on my mind projection thesis, in the future, we will be able to record our thoughts, the pictures in our mind, and the music as well. We will be able to drift into our subconscious and solve complex problems (because of low latent inhibition) while recording them.
...
-XJ
Friday, December 28, 2012
Notes: Thoughts On Abortion
These are notes. I am not for or against, just thinking through it.
2.) In doing so you are giving government permission to women to kill a living organism. FACT.
3.) By trying to define whether the organism is intelligent or not takes away from the issue. We can't define that, so why should that be a valid point with weight in the argument? That point is moot and null because it is unidentifiable. Let's work on what is identifiable to determine whether it is ethical to allow a woman to kill an organism within her.
M=W: What applies to a man must apply to a woman.
4.) If a man hit a pregnant woman crossing the street with his car and the woman miscarried could we call that murder...? Then we say it depends on the intention. A woman who is having an abortion intentionally kills the living organism within her. Okay, taking everything else out of the picture, if a man intentionally kills a fetus is it illegal...? We can say yes. Based on law M=W, if a woman does the same then it is also illegal.
5.) But see, we're not dealing with what's illegal or not, we're dealing with whether it is ethical and basing the law off of that. So is it ethical for a woman to kill a living organism within her...? Is it ethical to chop down trees...? Those are living organisms as well, are they not? But the argument is, trees are not human beings, trees are not people.
6.) This is why everyone is trying to set the point of intelligence for an organism inside the mother. It is arguably unethical to kill another human being. So if they find out when the organism becomes a human being, i.e. has intelligence, they can decide whether it should be law.
7.) Look, people have beliefs. These are BELIEFS. The question is, is it the RIGHT thing to do, if I had a wife, would it be the RIGHT thing to do to get an abortion...?
8.) There was a story a while back about a woman who needed an abortion and died because she couldn't get one. Hmmm...
9.) Should parental law be sovereign enough to allow mothers to kill the living organism within them...? If we say this, would we slippery-slope and eventually say that parents can kill their sons and daughters because parental law is sovereign...?
10.) "Are you for or against abortion...?" is equivalent to "Do you think it is right...?"... Do I think it is right...?
11.) What makes abortion wrong...? Is killing another human being wrong...? Yes or no...? If so, who defines what wrong is...? If we give permission to kill living organisms or prefactors to becoming human beings within us then how is it not permissible to kill human beings in general...?
12.) Concluding Thoughts: People should be able to do what they want. However, when does freedom turn into unethicalism...? If you give the people the choice, some of the people will take it, some of them won't. As president of a free country, if this is indeed 'free', one could allow the populace to think for themselves. However, as a leader, one would know that a population this massive is virulent under passive leadership, meaning, the masses think for themselves but that doesn't mean they think logically, all the time. In which case ample leadership is needed to set the record straight. No, America is NOT truly free. If it were so, anything could happen... use your imagination. Abortion could be legal, but we could make a law that basically says, if you have an abortion then it counts as a sort of label that is not punishable by law, but it holds on your record. However, that might be too governmentally invasive. Who says it's the government's duty in the first place to get into these matters...?
So am I for or against abortion...? Do I think it is right...? My answer is thus: I am not pregnant. I will never be pregnant. It is not my right or any of my business as a person to decide what pregnant women should be allowed to do with their lives. Seeing as it doesn't affect me or hasn't affected me, in all my intelligence, I have come to the conclusion that I cannot be "for" or "against" abortion. Whether it is legal or not, that decision belongs to the mothers out there or the would-be mothers who have or have not gone through it. They are the ones who know the pros and cons of doing it. They are the ones who know whether its consequences should determine the legal status of it. That decision does not belong to religious sects, cults, whatever you want to call them. And it certainly doesn't belong to the government. Don't ask a neighbor what you should have for breakfast in your own house. That is their house. Not mine. I am too limited in scope.
-XJ
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Inventions: 3D Space Recorder and 3D Space Projector
This is the diagram of how this invention works...
Basically, what we have here is a field of small sensors, thousands of them, the more you have the higher the resolution. These sensors track the location and depth of the object in the field (including the depth of the object itself) while it is moving and record it in raw data. The data is then transferred to the projector to be processed / rearranged into a specific order that is respectively emulated and displayed in the cells or 2D planes of the apparatus. The layering of 2D planes in concordance with the 'depth' data that is processed creates a 3D object.
-XJ
In My Own Words: Treating the Root of the Problem
Today, I got angry. That anger started out being projected towards another person who chose to do something that I disagree with. Because I was ignorant at the time of happening, I figured I was powerless to an authoritarian decision that affected my life in a negative way. I allowed this decision to be the final-say without questioning it until years later. That is my fault. Based on my anger projection theory (soon to come in my notes) I realized that I was angry with myself for allowing that person's choice to affect my life when it is my responsibility to do something about it.
It is my responsibility to get what I want in life, not what someone else wants for me. Consequently, what I wanted and needed were the same thing at that time, and they were denied by someone in a position of more power (but remember, this person only had power because I gave it to him). What did I want and need...? TIME. Time to be myself, to find things that I like doing instead of aimlessly trudging forward in the dark.
Then I thought, when I needed it the most, I couldn't get it. Now, when I don't need it, I have it. I have the time to relax and focus on me, to find out more about me, to be me. I have the time to work on things that I previously had more passion to do, even though now, my body physically doesn't want to. I've been tired out. Now this makes me angry.
"They didn't give it to me when I needed it. Why, why, WHY...!?!"
Why, exactly. And I start to think, why am I crushing myself to do this 'thing' anyways...? This supposed 'dream' that I've always wanted to do. It's in my hands now, the only way it will not get done is if I choose not to do it. Why wouldn't I do it...? I've always wanted to do this, right...?
But these years have not been kind to me. I know better than anyone, that once you look from outside the matrix, there is possibly no way of returning back to formal cognition. I know, this 'dream' is nothing more than the alteration and conditioning of my physical self earlier in my life to promote an idea that aids what I call, 'the Big Z'... You could also call it brainwashing. You see stars on t.v. Then you see a preconditioned audience wooing for that star. Everyone wants to be famous... but WHY...? Because we're conditioned to feel that way. We're conditioned to want power. To work for that power. And all in this process we're making the Big Z even more powerful.
Why should I want this 'thing'? Why should I want to be famous...? How can a person want to be famous but not even know the pretexts for it...? I am culpable. Culpable for being gullible and conditionable, but only because I know it. It wasn't my fault then but what I know now makes me guilty to my own anger. Because if you are not ignorant, then you must know that you are the only one who has control over you're life.
So in being angry with myself, I will write about "the Big Z". Why I have distaste for them. Why they are responsible for every violent outtake that happens in the United States and country that has tasted or smelled the lingering aftertaste of their presence. Disgusting is an understatement. No, I can no longer project my anger at other people. That doesn't solve the problem. If we martyr the criminals of society we are only treating the symptom of a problem emblematic of the larger picture. I have to go under the surface. I have to treat the root. I have to be responsible for being submissive to people who are created just as equal as us. And in doing so, hopefully, I will enlighten some people out there subjected to this issue.
In my own words,
-XJ
It is my responsibility to get what I want in life, not what someone else wants for me. Consequently, what I wanted and needed were the same thing at that time, and they were denied by someone in a position of more power (but remember, this person only had power because I gave it to him). What did I want and need...? TIME. Time to be myself, to find things that I like doing instead of aimlessly trudging forward in the dark.
Then I thought, when I needed it the most, I couldn't get it. Now, when I don't need it, I have it. I have the time to relax and focus on me, to find out more about me, to be me. I have the time to work on things that I previously had more passion to do, even though now, my body physically doesn't want to. I've been tired out. Now this makes me angry.
"They didn't give it to me when I needed it. Why, why, WHY...!?!"
Why, exactly. And I start to think, why am I crushing myself to do this 'thing' anyways...? This supposed 'dream' that I've always wanted to do. It's in my hands now, the only way it will not get done is if I choose not to do it. Why wouldn't I do it...? I've always wanted to do this, right...?
But these years have not been kind to me. I know better than anyone, that once you look from outside the matrix, there is possibly no way of returning back to formal cognition. I know, this 'dream' is nothing more than the alteration and conditioning of my physical self earlier in my life to promote an idea that aids what I call, 'the Big Z'... You could also call it brainwashing. You see stars on t.v. Then you see a preconditioned audience wooing for that star. Everyone wants to be famous... but WHY...? Because we're conditioned to feel that way. We're conditioned to want power. To work for that power. And all in this process we're making the Big Z even more powerful.
Why should I want this 'thing'? Why should I want to be famous...? How can a person want to be famous but not even know the pretexts for it...? I am culpable. Culpable for being gullible and conditionable, but only because I know it. It wasn't my fault then but what I know now makes me guilty to my own anger. Because if you are not ignorant, then you must know that you are the only one who has control over you're life.
So in being angry with myself, I will write about "the Big Z". Why I have distaste for them. Why they are responsible for every violent outtake that happens in the United States and country that has tasted or smelled the lingering aftertaste of their presence. Disgusting is an understatement. No, I can no longer project my anger at other people. That doesn't solve the problem. If we martyr the criminals of society we are only treating the symptom of a problem emblematic of the larger picture. I have to go under the surface. I have to treat the root. I have to be responsible for being submissive to people who are created just as equal as us. And in doing so, hopefully, I will enlighten some people out there subjected to this issue.
In my own words,
-XJ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)