This is basically the idea that supports that "we allow ourselves to become victimized." (Or other action in place of.)
1.) THE MASTER IDEA:
A human's imagination is rooted in 3D, therefore the explanation I provide will utilize this condition. That being said, the basis for the existence of all is the Master Idea. To put it simply, the base or cornerstone of all creation, settled at the bottom of the stack, is a static and concrete 'idea' that never changes but somehow fuels and influences the physical domain(s) above it to manifest in a way that coincides with the 'direction' of its 'print'. To be more accurate it would suffice to say that the Master Idea is the plan of the Universe, and the energy for the Universe, which is the Universe itself. So the Master Idea is everything, and pervades everything, even though we don't have specific devices to detect it alone (yet). This also leads us to conclude that there is no Time as we perceive it, a dot moving on a timeline. There is just a dot; no past, no future, only the present constantly changing in the NOW.
2.) BROADCASTING:
Arguably, there is an ether that transcends all levels above the source, whether physical or metaphysical (that being able to be detected or not), that acts as a stream to carry 'information' to and through everything connected to it. The details of information, or 'organic data', is yet to be discussed (it could be suggested that energy is itself data).
3.) THE MANNER of BROADCASTING:
People are the physical materialization or result of the Master Idea broadcasting itself 'through matter' (quoted because matter is the Master Idea, so it is figurative). Unlike the Master Idea, which is constant, because we are physical, we change. When the information a person broadcasts changes, the attitude of the information changes, or in other words the 'color' of the message changes. In any event regarding Free Will or lack thereof, when we change a 'color', the 'information' that is broadcast is sent as a request through the ether to whoever or whatever is in contact with it. You can imagine a node sending out wave ripples of information around it. The ripples continue to flow until decay and friction make them null (which we will not go into here). If Free Will exists, then the people that receive the request have the choice to answer it, to respond to it, or to ignore it. In responding to the request, whether to do an action that is morally or ethically right or wrong, the receiver helps mold the sender's destiny.
4.) CONCLUSION:
Changing the 'color' of the information being broadcast through us can change the responses we get from people we are in contact with, whether they are literally right in front of us, in another country, or in another realm. This relies heavily on Free Will (or non Free Will equivalent). The problem now lies in finding how to change the 'color' voluntarily, on our own accord. Of course, we haven't gone into complexity of this, which would detail all of the possible configurations for sending and receiving requests, including sending and receiving requests of requests and compounded requests.
-XJ
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Thoughts: All Noise is a Memory, An Extension of YOU
Today, I am nothing. and the universe was once the same. Nothing. There is nothing. But it is so powerful, to be nothing at all. How does nothing hold so much power...? Let us liken nothing to silence and use them interchangeably.
The power is not in the absence of sound, it is not in the void itself. When everything is nothing, there is nothing to compare, so there is no value. The power is not in the nothing. It is in the memory of the nothing, that being just as strong, if not stronger, as the reality of something. We don't know that it was silent until we hear the noise. But when we do, I suppose this would be called 'having Knowledge'.
Now I am going to analogize the problem that one might consider with memories and silence to a small tape recorder in a black void. One might be wondering, "If the tape recorder was always rolling, if our memories were pre-existent to the noise, then why couldn't we record sound, granted it would be all silence, but wouldn't we be able to 'have Knowledge', wouldn't we be aware none-the-less...?" This is easy to solve. The solution is that the memories could NOT have existed, the tape recorder could not have existed, before the noise. Meaning, I am not saying the recorder was recording when it was silent, I am saying that the recorder is the noise, so it could not have recorded until it itself existed. The recorder, memories, are the 'noise', therefore, it records itself. Memories are but another 'noise', for how else would it contrast itself to nothing, to silence? For if there were all silence, but memories existed, it would 'know' there is all silence because it itself would be noise... get it? Furthermore, this leads to conclude that all noise could be but a memory, that contrasts of different frequencies within itself, and that all originate from the same source.
So when you see a water bottle on the table next to you while you are typing, what I am saying is, that is a memory, which is a noise. But in some way, your 'tape recorder' wouldn't be able to 'remember' it, the water bottle itself wouldn't even exist, if your tape recorder didn't exist.
Hmm, there is something to get from this. I can't put my finger on it...
Now another question is, why is it that when we observe nothing, or any absolute in anything, which equates to nothing, this nothing-ness, this silence always leads to an explosion of noise...?
Stuff to think about...
(tbc.)
-XJ
The power is not in the absence of sound, it is not in the void itself. When everything is nothing, there is nothing to compare, so there is no value. The power is not in the nothing. It is in the memory of the nothing, that being just as strong, if not stronger, as the reality of something. We don't know that it was silent until we hear the noise. But when we do, I suppose this would be called 'having Knowledge'.
Now I am going to analogize the problem that one might consider with memories and silence to a small tape recorder in a black void. One might be wondering, "If the tape recorder was always rolling, if our memories were pre-existent to the noise, then why couldn't we record sound, granted it would be all silence, but wouldn't we be able to 'have Knowledge', wouldn't we be aware none-the-less...?" This is easy to solve. The solution is that the memories could NOT have existed, the tape recorder could not have existed, before the noise. Meaning, I am not saying the recorder was recording when it was silent, I am saying that the recorder is the noise, so it could not have recorded until it itself existed. The recorder, memories, are the 'noise', therefore, it records itself. Memories are but another 'noise', for how else would it contrast itself to nothing, to silence? For if there were all silence, but memories existed, it would 'know' there is all silence because it itself would be noise... get it? Furthermore, this leads to conclude that all noise could be but a memory, that contrasts of different frequencies within itself, and that all originate from the same source.
So when you see a water bottle on the table next to you while you are typing, what I am saying is, that is a memory, which is a noise. But in some way, your 'tape recorder' wouldn't be able to 'remember' it, the water bottle itself wouldn't even exist, if your tape recorder didn't exist.
Hmm, there is something to get from this. I can't put my finger on it...
Now another question is, why is it that when we observe nothing, or any absolute in anything, which equates to nothing, this nothing-ness, this silence always leads to an explosion of noise...?
Stuff to think about...
(tbc.)
-XJ
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Inventions: 'Noter'
Usual ideas for inventions arise from the need to complete a task, mixed with common sense and the lack of innovation to complete it. This invention is no different. 'Noter' is an online blogging site but the blogs are done entirely in a drawing-type application that looks like a blank notepad or notebook. Similar to modern blogging sites, the user has the capability to use HTML and CSS to change the template, or use a template 'guide'. The application can use 2D or 3D canvas and saves the post and all images in the post by the coordinates and data of an image, or page, created by the user. Saving the coordinates of a stroke or line gives the user more options, specifically when replaying or editing. Basically, it is Microsoft Paint and Notepad on steroids. It can be used on a pad device (or laptop) to quickly jot down notes or ideas, or can be used for more lengthy projects such as a personal site, power-point equivalent presentation, or what else.
-XJ
Monday, August 12, 2013
Thoughts: Why a Thought is More Than a Reality
A thought is more than a reality. It is all of 'time' before it, the progenitor and the precedence in one. It is the object of a nebulous Truth, formed through a mystery of the 'Consciousness'. Understand that doubt may erase the validity of a thought, but it does not erase the Truth from where it came. Even if the thought is dismissed, we have to accept the Truth that formed it. If we go backwards and uncondense the thought, expand it into the Truth it was founded on, we would be able to find insights into why the thought occurred. It is not wrong to judge a thought, whether you think it should be accepted or not, good or bad, etc. But we should not forget that even ridiculous thoughts come from Truth. In fact, ALL thoughts come from Truth. My point is, we should pay more attention to the Truth the thought comes from than the validity of the thought itself.
-XJ
-XJ
Friday, August 9, 2013
Project NEO: Design Update
I just know users would be complaining about the last design of NEO. So I redid it. It is very simple and easy to use. Also, you might be noticing that it is in 3D...
-XJ
-XJ
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
A Game: Hex-J
Too tired. Will explain all of the rules later. The awesome thing about this game is that it is so generic it can be applied to different genres and video games (...).
(tbc...)
-XJ
Sunday, August 4, 2013
A Theory: The 'One Light' Theory
THE 'ONE LIGHT' THEORY
EXPLAINING THE REFLECTION, OR TRANSFER, OF *A SUBSTANCE VIA A NETWORK OF MIRRORS
by XJ Hall
Hello, I came up with ANOTHER theory having to do with a 'network'. This is different than the last because it uses 'mirrors' to explain the transfer of a substance related to survival (hang with me). This is interesting because when we normally think of embodying a characteristic or property, we think of it as something that WE generated, or something that originates from us. Whereas, this theory challenges that notion by saying that all we are as humans, all anything is as a node in the network, is a reflection, or mirror, of what already exists. We don't have any properties other than what we reflect...! The properties of who we are are the result of the transfer of an omniscient 'light' in a way where it is concentrated into rays and bounced off of mirrors, or different compositions of the omniscient light.
THE THEORY:
The whole of what we perceive to 'be', 'life', as far as we can tell, is 'a network': a labyrinthine conglomeration of connections based on stimuli, to be sensed, assimilated, comprehended, analyzed, interpreted, metaphorized, rationalized, philosophized, produced and re-produced, and challenged and re-explained via alternate, and eye-opening, explanations. Perhaps, this is one such explanation, but a brief one at that.
If you asked me questions about the network it would be easier for me to explain it to you. But since you are not here, at least yet, I will have to emulate the questions that I think you would like to ask.
"What is this about...?"
I was postulating on forgiveness and I realized that there exists within humans something like a 'mirror' that can be pivoted via an invisible axis that runs through it. Hang with me here, this is interesting. It is a one sided mirror: on one side is a reflective surface and on the other is a non reflective surface. In being a one sided mirror, humans, or nodes, can reflect the stimuli passed through a connection, or they can turn the mirror inward to basically reflect nothing at all. Assumed to be a matter of choice, upon fully introverting the node becomes invisible to the network. Why is this so...? The network itself IS an omniscient 'light', a type of 'ether', if you will. It has always been an omniscient light and exists in of itself, however it was not a network until somehow nodes started popping up. This suggests that nodes are a different composition of the light, but are composed of the light none-the-less. The nodes were able to reflect the omniscient light; in doing so they 'were' in the network because they could not 'be'in the network unless light was reflected from them. This leads to conclude that light cannot be seen unless there is a node, with its mirror turned outward, to reflect it.
"So what are you saying...?"
A network must be comprised of at least two nodes that are connected. The connection would be the omnicient light, the 'ONE LIGHT'. We cannot know we exist within the network unless there is another node that reflects the ONE LIGHT, and we cannot be known to exist by other nodes unless we, ourselves as nodes, reflect the ONE LIGHT. We can exist without knowing, but in order to know, we must exist within the network. Light cannot be seen unless there is a mirror to reflect it. Get it...?
Now moving on, the omnicient light that makes up the network can be bounced off of one node to another throughout the network in way so that it is disperssed in an indiscriminant manner, so that some nodes recieve more or less light than others. Moreover, in heavilly concentrated areas where light is reflected from multiple nodes, the node whose mirror is facing the concentration will reflect the properties of all of those beams, seemingly an augmented reflection of light. So what I am saying is, a node such as the sun is a huge reflection of all of the light being concentrated at it. Were the sun's 'mirror' faced inward, we would not see the light focused in space. Get it...?
"And...?"
Applying this to humans, the light 'goes through' every thing in the network, but we are unable to see it, all the time, because there is not always a 'mirror', or node, to reflect it. Okay...? The first human did not know that he existed until the second human gave him reference of that (until the second node reflected the light).
So what's my point...? Thinking about forgiveness I began to think about this paradigm and what it means. I think, as nodes, humans may have several mirrors that reflect different compressions of the omnicient 'light', and one of the mirrors reflects what I cannot name but will analogize with 'love', 'knowledge', and 'truth', all together. Basically, these are survival 'substances', a 'substance K', probably the most purest form of compression of the ONE LIGHT.
And you might say, so what...? Remember, I said that a node ceases to know it exists if it is not part of the network, and it can only be part of the network if it reflects light. So if a human were to turn its mirror inward from substance K, a compression of ONE LIGHT, the human would be doomed to survive within the network, at least from reflecting substance K. There are probably other 'substances', or compressions of ONE LIGHT, but let's just say, for this explanation only, that substance K WAS the only substance that was reflected. And let's just say that the network consists of billions of human nodes, each with their mirror turned at various degrees, each reflecting substance K, consequently creating a network that may be more densly permeated with substance K in some areas than in others. What I am saying is there is a relationship here. The 'areas', or spaces, of the network where substance K is less concentrated will have the inability to reflect the most from it. However, this does not mean that the most densly permeated space of the network will be utilized efficiently, if there are few or no nodes to reflect the light back into the network. Get it...?
"Well, XJ, this is rather abstract. What do you plan on using this for...?"
It is interesting, really. I know I've been coming up with ideas related to networks, I need to stop doing that. But we can apply this to some things. I mean, how is substance K communicated to each node...? Through 'reflecting'. But what is reflecting...? Obviously, 'reflection' could be a simple abstract term for more complex things such as the science, or behavior of 'behavior'. This leads to connections with my previous post that suggests that the 'uptake', or in this case 'reflection', of substance K is for the most part independent of logical surface meaning (despite what we believe) and relies on what is reflected to us in a systematic manner. This would include the angle of 'light' reflected to us, or the way we behave in order to change the 'angle' of our 'mirrors'. Remember, we can't be anything we don't reflect. We are what we reflect, and if we didn't reflect we wouldn't be (at least in the network). So being able to systematically change our 'mirrors' to reflect the most light would be interesting. There are things that I have not mentioned here, like the current scientific explanations for the properties of light could be applied to this theory. For instance, diffusion, color, wavelength, etc.
This whole theory could probably be made into a movie. We might be able to do something with this behavior wise. I mean, in a network see what we can do...
Not sure what else to say. Just my thoughts,
-XJ
EXPLAINING THE REFLECTION, OR TRANSFER, OF *A SUBSTANCE VIA A NETWORK OF MIRRORS
by XJ Hall
Hello, I came up with ANOTHER theory having to do with a 'network'. This is different than the last because it uses 'mirrors' to explain the transfer of a substance related to survival (hang with me). This is interesting because when we normally think of embodying a characteristic or property, we think of it as something that WE generated, or something that originates from us. Whereas, this theory challenges that notion by saying that all we are as humans, all anything is as a node in the network, is a reflection, or mirror, of what already exists. We don't have any properties other than what we reflect...! The properties of who we are are the result of the transfer of an omniscient 'light' in a way where it is concentrated into rays and bounced off of mirrors, or different compositions of the omniscient light.
THE THEORY:
The whole of what we perceive to 'be', 'life', as far as we can tell, is 'a network': a labyrinthine conglomeration of connections based on stimuli, to be sensed, assimilated, comprehended, analyzed, interpreted, metaphorized, rationalized, philosophized, produced and re-produced, and challenged and re-explained via alternate, and eye-opening, explanations. Perhaps, this is one such explanation, but a brief one at that.
If you asked me questions about the network it would be easier for me to explain it to you. But since you are not here, at least yet, I will have to emulate the questions that I think you would like to ask.
"What is this about...?"
I was postulating on forgiveness and I realized that there exists within humans something like a 'mirror' that can be pivoted via an invisible axis that runs through it. Hang with me here, this is interesting. It is a one sided mirror: on one side is a reflective surface and on the other is a non reflective surface. In being a one sided mirror, humans, or nodes, can reflect the stimuli passed through a connection, or they can turn the mirror inward to basically reflect nothing at all. Assumed to be a matter of choice, upon fully introverting the node becomes invisible to the network. Why is this so...? The network itself IS an omniscient 'light', a type of 'ether', if you will. It has always been an omniscient light and exists in of itself, however it was not a network until somehow nodes started popping up. This suggests that nodes are a different composition of the light, but are composed of the light none-the-less. The nodes were able to reflect the omniscient light; in doing so they 'were' in the network because they could not 'be'in the network unless light was reflected from them. This leads to conclude that light cannot be seen unless there is a node, with its mirror turned outward, to reflect it.
"So what are you saying...?"
A network must be comprised of at least two nodes that are connected. The connection would be the omnicient light, the 'ONE LIGHT'. We cannot know we exist within the network unless there is another node that reflects the ONE LIGHT, and we cannot be known to exist by other nodes unless we, ourselves as nodes, reflect the ONE LIGHT. We can exist without knowing, but in order to know, we must exist within the network. Light cannot be seen unless there is a mirror to reflect it. Get it...?
Now moving on, the omnicient light that makes up the network can be bounced off of one node to another throughout the network in way so that it is disperssed in an indiscriminant manner, so that some nodes recieve more or less light than others. Moreover, in heavilly concentrated areas where light is reflected from multiple nodes, the node whose mirror is facing the concentration will reflect the properties of all of those beams, seemingly an augmented reflection of light. So what I am saying is, a node such as the sun is a huge reflection of all of the light being concentrated at it. Were the sun's 'mirror' faced inward, we would not see the light focused in space. Get it...?
"And...?"
Applying this to humans, the light 'goes through' every thing in the network, but we are unable to see it, all the time, because there is not always a 'mirror', or node, to reflect it. Okay...? The first human did not know that he existed until the second human gave him reference of that (until the second node reflected the light).
So what's my point...? Thinking about forgiveness I began to think about this paradigm and what it means. I think, as nodes, humans may have several mirrors that reflect different compressions of the omnicient 'light', and one of the mirrors reflects what I cannot name but will analogize with 'love', 'knowledge', and 'truth', all together. Basically, these are survival 'substances', a 'substance K', probably the most purest form of compression of the ONE LIGHT.
And you might say, so what...? Remember, I said that a node ceases to know it exists if it is not part of the network, and it can only be part of the network if it reflects light. So if a human were to turn its mirror inward from substance K, a compression of ONE LIGHT, the human would be doomed to survive within the network, at least from reflecting substance K. There are probably other 'substances', or compressions of ONE LIGHT, but let's just say, for this explanation only, that substance K WAS the only substance that was reflected. And let's just say that the network consists of billions of human nodes, each with their mirror turned at various degrees, each reflecting substance K, consequently creating a network that may be more densly permeated with substance K in some areas than in others. What I am saying is there is a relationship here. The 'areas', or spaces, of the network where substance K is less concentrated will have the inability to reflect the most from it. However, this does not mean that the most densly permeated space of the network will be utilized efficiently, if there are few or no nodes to reflect the light back into the network. Get it...?
"Well, XJ, this is rather abstract. What do you plan on using this for...?"
It is interesting, really. I know I've been coming up with ideas related to networks, I need to stop doing that. But we can apply this to some things. I mean, how is substance K communicated to each node...? Through 'reflecting'. But what is reflecting...? Obviously, 'reflection' could be a simple abstract term for more complex things such as the science, or behavior of 'behavior'. This leads to connections with my previous post that suggests that the 'uptake', or in this case 'reflection', of substance K is for the most part independent of logical surface meaning (despite what we believe) and relies on what is reflected to us in a systematic manner. This would include the angle of 'light' reflected to us, or the way we behave in order to change the 'angle' of our 'mirrors'. Remember, we can't be anything we don't reflect. We are what we reflect, and if we didn't reflect we wouldn't be (at least in the network). So being able to systematically change our 'mirrors' to reflect the most light would be interesting. There are things that I have not mentioned here, like the current scientific explanations for the properties of light could be applied to this theory. For instance, diffusion, color, wavelength, etc.
This whole theory could probably be made into a movie. We might be able to do something with this behavior wise. I mean, in a network see what we can do...
Not sure what else to say. Just my thoughts,
-XJ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)